Hello!
I'm trying to setup my dual interface machine to act as an ftp proxy for
my home LAN.
The machine has two interfaces: ep0 (10.10.0.2/28) and ep1 (connected to
the cable-modem, with DHCP-obtained settings).
It is a real shame, this part is so poorly documented,
but I
You are, as is so often the case, correct. The way you phrase your
responses sometimes blinds me, and evidently others, to the complete
circumstances.
-Kip
On 21 Sep 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is in no way a
A couple of weeks ago it was mentioned on this list that the CODA
filesystem was not safe for SMP machines.
Is this actually the case? Is this likely to change?
Carl.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Greg Lewis wrote:
> > Actually, there is one other option, I used it. Compile a single CPU kernel,
> > install StarOffice , then compile you SMP kernel and use StarOffice...
> Ahh, so it only tries the forking during install then. I wasn't aware of
Doesn't work for me. I
All - my apologies... this question-mail was meant to be sent to
freebsd-questions... not -stable. Sorry for the error.
--John
Welcome to the next of my "it seems like the answer would be so simple"
questions...
Is there a way to get the system to re-read /etc/rc.conf witho
Welcome to the next of my "it seems like the answer would be so simple"
questions...
Is there a way to get the system to re-read /etc/rc.conf without a
shutdown/reboot?
Thanks!!!
--John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Kip Macy wrote:
> You are correct -- what one really needs is a per user limit on files --
> there may already be something to that effect, although I do not know of
> it.
That's because you completely disregarded all of the explanations
for the current behavior tha
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 03:41:00PM +0200, Markus Holmberg wrote:
> Same here.
>
> This started happening to my 3.2-STABLE + Netscape Communicator 4.6
> (FreeBSD native) recently too.
>
> Frequently core-dumping with SIGBUS (always on Slashdot).. This never
> used to happen before..
I tried th
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Kip Macy wrote:
> Thanks. Although having maxfiles == maxfilesperproc might make sense for
> special cases e.g. a machine completely dedicated to one process -- It is
> dangerous at best for the general case. Any malicious program can make a
> machine running FreeBSD non-func
Obviously not from the default settings.
Typically limits are in place to protect something from something. This,
however, may be an exception.
-Kip
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, David Schwartz wrote:
> > Thanks. Although having maxfiles == maxfilesperproc might
You are correct -- what one really needs is a per user limit on files --
there may already be something to that effect, although I do not know of
it.
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Bryan Talbot wrote:
> At 04:23 PM 9/21/99 , Kip Macy wrote:
> >Thanks. Although having maxfiles == maxfilesperproc might mak
> Thanks. Although having maxfiles == maxfilesperproc might make sense for
> special cases e.g. a machine completely dedicated to one process -- It is
> dangerous at best for the general case. Any malicious program can make a
> machine running FreeBSD non-functional. The default should be set with
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 04:23:19PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote:
> Thanks. Although having maxfiles == maxfilesperproc might make sense for
> special cases e.g. a machine completely dedicated to one process -- It is
> dangerous at best for the general case. Any malicious program can make a
> machine runn
At 04:23 PM 9/21/99 , Kip Macy wrote:
>Thanks. Although having maxfiles == maxfilesperproc might make sense for
>special cases e.g. a machine completely dedicated to one process -- It is
>dangerous at best for the general case. Any malicious program can make a
>machine running FreeBSD non-function
14 matches
Mail list logo
