> Well folks...
>
> I've followed http://www.serv.net/~mcglk/staroffice-install.html to the
> letter but can't get StarOffice to run on my 3.3-STABLE box. The newest
> error I'm getting comes after the install has completed. Actually, I
> think it may have appeared just before completion, but I
I want to unsubscribe from stable
so anyone help with the procedure to unsubscribe
my email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Brad Knowles wrote:
>
> At 3:32 PM -0600 1999/9/20, Wes Peters wrote:
>
> > Granted, the answer DES gave was a little cryptic.
>
> Cryptic. Hmm. That's not exactly the word I'd choose, but I'm
> willing to leave it at that for now.
>
> >
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Chad R. Larson wrote:
: Anybody sign up for doing the Native FreeBSD port whenever Sun gets
: around to releasing the sources?
Sadly, I'm not much of a hacker, but if you need someone to test,
I'm your man! :-) I use StarOffice daily on RH6 and am fairly
familiar with it no
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Mike Holling wrote:
: until I went back and made a kernel with the POSIX options mentioned on
: the web page. StarOffice seems to hang on some Word docs, but I'm
: assuming this has nothing to do with FreeBSD.
It doesn't. I use StarOffice on RH6 at work and I have a stack
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > It occurs to me that WC could engage in some underhand but productive
> > marketing by quietly repurchasing the stock from Compusa shelves, thereby
>
> Heh, happily, we haven't even had to consider such a thing since
> first-time availability, co
> It occurs to me that WC could engage in some underhand but productive
> marketing by quietly repurchasing the stock from Compusa shelves, thereby
Heh, happily, we haven't even had to consider such a thing since
first-time availability, coupled with CompUSA's "competetive pricing"
(read: a sligh
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Matt Behrens wrote:
> : make installworld takes about 2 minutes.
>
> On a good, fast system, of course -- which I assume the original
> poster would have if he has customers using the system. On my poor
> ol' 5x86 with VLB IDE it takes 20 mins (-:
That was a deliberate exa
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
: make installworld takes about 2 minutes.
On a good, fast system, of course -- which I assume the original
poster would have if he has customers using the system. On my poor
ol' 5x86 with VLB IDE it takes 20 mins (-:
Matt Behrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
O
> NUMBER on the box, and no indication as to how many CDs of "stuff" are
> inside -- both pretty important to attract first-time users, when box-size
> and price are the only visible factors to separate you from the nearby
The only box version ever released so far has been 3.2, so the
customer g
Hi,
I am having problems with a program of mine getting stuck in the vmopar state
when it talks to our custom PCI DA card, and I was wondering if anyone could
give a pointer about where to start looking for problems?
>From my understanding vmopar is where a process is stuck waiting for a page to
I do this
to may back up drives
nice -20 rsh -K -l root www.host.net "cd /;nice -20 /sbin/dump -0ua -f -
/dev/wd0s1a" >> /mnt/backup1/date_machine.dump
or if you want to do a restore to drive and have it ready to replace
nice -20 rsh -K -l root www.host.net "cd /;nice -20 /sbin/dump -0ua -f -
With their ever-stricter licensing agreements and their ever-less
competitive position in the market, it is likely to be some time before
the source is released under a usable license.
-Kip
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> As I recall, Mike Smith wrot
As I recall, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> No, it uses the rmt(8) interface. You can't do what you're
> trying to do in the way you're trying to do it. :-)
>
> If I were trying to do that, I'd either NFS mount the dump
> directory off of backup or I'd do something like:
>
> dump 0af - | ss
14 matches
Mail list logo
