Long message, excuse the butcher job.
On Sat, September 17, 2005 08:19, Robert Watson wrote:
(b) We can consider a migration to NT/NFSv4-style ACLs, which is the route
that Darwin has taken. They use the FreeBSD user space ACL library
and POSIX.1e interfaces, but use ACLs with more N
y knew how easy
it was?
I support Free BSD either way, I buy books, and I buy the CD sets to help
out. And I will continue using it either way, I just would love tos ee
somethign like this implemented. As would a lot of others in my area.
I'd do it all myself and release it if I could code good en
On Tue, 23 May 2006 05:23:50 +1000
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think it would substantially reduce the reliability and security.
As opposed to people not installing patches in the first place because it takes
to l
how
yuo can't do this or that when you're installing oatches like Linux does, but
when you consider how mahy people don't even install patches because of how
much time it takes, or when someone liek I quoted says buy ANOTHER computer for
every arch you're using to use as a bui
On Wed, 24 May 2006 15:40:23 -0400
Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 2:45 PM -0400 5/24/06, Allen wrote:
> > >
> > > It really depends on how many machines you have, on how
> > > many different tasks they have and on which archictures
>
Well, I suspect that most people with the resources to do what you ask
have already moved on precisely because the EoL has been published.
i.e., faced with that limited commitment, we had no choice but to
(grudgingly and at the last minute) move on.
I think the most likely path of success is, as y
>From Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:51:13AM +0100:
>
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, security wrote:
>
> > You'll have the sources. If you're using 4.11 in a business, you need
> > to decide if it's more cost effective to move on to 6 or hire someone to
> >keep 4.11 runni
lease forward it appropriately?
Thanks,
Dan Allen
Building FreeBSD since 2.15
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Freshports shows "unbound" :-
>dns/unbound: Update to 1.19.1
>
>Release notes at
> https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/news/2024/Feb/13/unbound-1.19.1-released/
on 14th Feb and that update contained the fixes for both CVE-2023-50387
and CVE-2023-5086
https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/news/2024/Feb/13/unboun
e source is removed.
>
> Do we have alternative ssh clients in ports which will keep supporting
> DSA?
>
> Lots of old switches out there belong in similar categories and the
> =+ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
>
> I think providing a list of alternative clients somewhere for our
> use
10 matches
Mail list logo
