< said:
> Trond Endrestøl wrote:
>>
>> #minute hourmdaymonth wdaywho command
>>
>> 52 4 1 * * rootcertbot renew --quiet
>> --pre-hook "service apache24 stop" --post-hook "service apache24 start"
>> 52 1 15 * * root
On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 04:55 +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 21.08.2019 3:12, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote:
>
> [skip]
>
> > IV. Workaround
> >
> > No workaround is available. Custom kernels without "device sound"
> > are not vulnerable.
>
> Is it true that there is no way to disable vuln
grarpamp wrote on Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 17:04:08 -0400:
> How does one know their entire copy of repo obtained on
> DVD, "mirror", or elsewhere cryptographically
> matches the authoritative repo...
If someone wanted to add "signed commits" functionality to svn, I think
that would be possible and ev
Folks,
Since FreeBSD ships with IPv6 support enabled by default, aren't all
systems affected, one way or another?
Thanks,
Fernando
> =
> FreeBSD-SA-19:19.mldv2 Security Advisory
>
For consideration...
SVN really may not offer much in the way of native
internal self authenticating repo to cryptographic levels
of security against bitrot, transit corruption and repo ops,
external physical editing, have much signing options, etc.
Similar to blockchain and ZFS hash merkle-izatio
On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 09:58:35PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Which client is now recommended to work with Let's Encrypt?
>
> I see numerous clients in the ports tree, some deleted, some renamed...
> Which one is good?
I've been using security/dehydrated for years. Never had any problem wi
Hi,
Forgot to add MFH 2019Q3 to
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=510703
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=510711
Cheers, Bernard.
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mail
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:29 PM Clay Daniels Jr. wrote:
> Just whose secure keys do you suggest? I go to a lot of trouble to disable
> secure boot so I can load any operating system I want.
The goal would be not to disable secure boot and have FreeBSD running
with a secured bootloader :-)
At the
would be really nice also to get UEFI BOOT compatible with SECURE BOOT :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 22:01, grarpamp wrote:
>
> For consideration...
>
> SVN really may not offer much in the way of native
> internal self authenticating repo to cryptographic levels
> of security against bitrot, transit corruption and repo ops,
> external physical editing, have much signing op
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 08:43, grarpamp wrote:
>
> On 10/4/19, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 22:01, grarpamp wrote:
> >>
> >> For consideration...
> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2019-September/010099.html
> >>
> >> SVN really may not offer much in the
11 matches
Mail list logo