A recently quarterly report:
https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.html
and last week's BSD Now episode both hint that quarterly packages will be the
default for 10.2. I just looked, and sure enough:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.2/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf?vi
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 04:20:08PM -0400, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
> subversion-1.8.10_3 is vulnerable:
To clarify, I had this one artificially held back. The up to date quarterly
package vulnerability list for Subversion looks like this:
subversion-1.8.13_2 is vulnerable:
subversion -- multipl
[info@ removed, not sure why that email address was included.]
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 04:20:08PM -0400, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
> A recently quarterly report:
>
> https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.html
>
> and last week's BSD Now episode both hint that quarterly p
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 08:40:23PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> [info@ removed, not sure why that email address was included.]
I'm hoping for pressure from above, as this is an important step that's
evidently being taken without quarterly branch security being bumped up in
priority. It seems to co
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:01:29PM -0400, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 08:40:23PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> > [info@ removed, not sure why that email address was included.]
>
> I'm hoping for pressure from above, as this is an important step that's
> evidently being tak
