Re: LogJam exploit can force TLS down to 512 bytes, does it affect us? ?

2015-05-21 Thread Winfried Neessen
Hi, > The document at https://weakdh.org/sysadmin.html gives additional > information for individual daemons, including Apache (mod_ssl), nginx, > lighttpd, Tomcat, postfix, sendmail, dovecot and HAProxy. > Unfortunately the documentation does only offer guidance for Apache 2.4. As Apache 2.2 do

Re: LogJam exploit can force TLS down to 512 bytes, does it affect us? ?

2015-05-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 05/20/15 23:48, Xin Li wrote: > The document at https://weakdh.org/sysadmin.html gives additional > information for individual daemons, including Apache (mod_ssl), nginx, > lighttpd, Tomcat, postfix, sendmail, dovecot and HAProxy. The part of that https://weakdh.org/ site that concerns me most