Re: LogJam exploit can force TLS down to 512 bytes, does it affect us? ?

2015-05-20 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/20/15 14:40, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi secur...@freebsd.org Please note that secur...@freebsd.org = sect...@freebsd.org. Since this is posted to ports@ which is public, I'm assuming it's not intended to be in private. > (& bcc'd a couple

Re: LogJam exploit can force TLS down to 512 bytes, does it affect us? ?

2015-05-20 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Xin Li wrote: > On 05/20/15 14:40, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi secur...@freebsd.org > > Please note that secur...@freebsd.org = sect...@freebsd.org. Since > this is posted to ports@ which is public, I'm assuming it's not > intended to be in private. Yes, correct, thanks Xin Li, (Sorry I fo