Re: freebsd-security Digest, Vol 634, Issue 3

2017-10-19 Thread Joey Kelly
> > In this case, for a low-tech people, I would tend to suggest using SFTP > (a password-based access is enough) instead of a stunneled SMB share as > I personally find it is easier to setup and more efficient. If you have an ssh server (if you have FreeBSD, you have one), that will function as

Re: freebsd-security Digest, Vol 634, Issue 3

2017-10-19 Thread WhiteWinterWolf (Simon)
Hi Walter, Le 18/10/2017 à 22:52, Walter Parker a écrit : > SMB has supported authentication signing for a long time (more than a > decade). That can be used for basic security. > SMB3 supports encryption. To work with SMB3 encryption you will need > at least Windows 8. > The Samba project suppor

Re: freebsd-security Digest, Vol 634, Issue 3

2017-10-18 Thread Walter Parker
> > > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 21:00:11 -0700 > From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" > To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: WPA2 bugz - One Man's Quick & Dirty Response > Message-ID: <32999.1508299...@segfault.tristatelogic.com> > > > In message <49252eda-3d48-f7bc-95e7-db716db4e...