Hi all
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 09/20/17 20:06, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > A tiny diff to make it easier to grep sysctl descriptions:
> >
> > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/src/gen/sys/dev/usb/usb_hub.c.REL=12.0-CURRENT.diff
>
> Hi,
>
> Please wrap the long string
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:18:02 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 09/20/17 20:06, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > A tiny diff to make it easier to grep sysctl descriptions:
> > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/src/gen/sys/dev/usb/usb_hub.c.REL=12.0-CURRENT.diff
>
> Hi,
>
> Pleas
Hi Julian,
You don't need microscopic chips or highly engineered devices to
implement a working BadUSB attack.
Nothing looks more as a Dell mouse than another Dell mouse, and a
malicious mouse offers plenty of space to store all the chips you may
want. USB sticks are also still widely found
On 09/20/17 20:06, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
A tiny diff to make it easier to grep sysctl descriptions:
http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/src/gen/sys/dev/usb/usb_hub.c.REL=12.0-CURRENT.diff
Hi,
Please wrap the long string in multiple pieces before committing it.
Looks g
Hi usb@ & security@ freebsd.org,
hps@ (cc'd) introduced a FreeBSD Sysctl Oct 2014:
hw.usb.disable_enumeration: 0
dev.uhub.4.disable_enumeration: 0
dev.uhub.3.disable_enumeration: 0
dev.uhub.2.disable_enumeration: 0
dev.uhub.1.disable_enumeration: 0
de
On 10/22/14 03:09, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
Hans,
Thank-you for these enhancements, as its good to have something in the
armoury to try to address this issue.
I applied the patch
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2014-October/063443.html to
an updated 10.Stable overnight. Disabli
On 10/10/2014 1:44 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 10/09/14 15:59, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>> On 10/9/14, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>> Hi Julian,
>>>
>>> On 10/09/14 01:46, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi Hans etc
"Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> Hi,
>
On 10/9/14, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 10/09/14 15:59, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>> On 10/9/14, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>> Hi Julian,
>>>
>>> On 10/09/14 01:46, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi Hans etc
"Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ca
On 10/09/14 15:59, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 10/9/14, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi Julian,
On 10/09/14 01:46, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi Hans etc
"Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Can you test the following kernel patch and give some feedback:
https://svnweb.freebsd.
> BTW: I've added some exceptions, that existing devices can be detached,
> suspend/resumed and reset while the enumeration is disabled.
>
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/272807
> Can you also test that patch?
OK, will do. (I've got a cold so I'm slow & making mistakes, sorry).
I
Hi, Reference:
> From: Oliver Pinter
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:59:28 +0200
Oliver Pinter wrote:
> On 10/9/14, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > Hi Julian,
> >
> > On 10/09/14 01:46, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> >> Hi Hans etc
> >> "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> >>> Hans Petter Selasky wr
On 10/9/14, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> On 10/09/14 01:46, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> Hi Hans etc
>> "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
>>> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Can you test the following kernel patch and give some feedback:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/chan
Hi Julian,
On 10/09/14 01:46, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi Hans etc
"Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Can you test the following kernel patch and give some feedback:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/272733
I'm now on latest current with src & sys/ GENERIC
/usr
Hi Hans etc
"Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you test the following kernel patch and give some feedback:
> >
> > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/272733
I'm now on latest current with src & sys/ GENERIC
/usr/src/.ctm_status# src-cur 11645
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you test the following kernel patch and give some feedback:
>
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/272733
>
> After the patch you will get something like:
>
> hw.usb.disable_enumeration: 0
> dev.uhub.0.disable_enumeration: 0
> dev.uhub.1.disable_e
Hi,
Can you test the following kernel patch and give some feedback:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/272733
After the patch you will get something like:
hw.usb.disable_enumeration: 0
dev.uhub.0.disable_enumeration: 0
dev.uhub.1.disable_enumeration: 0
...
which is also settable throug
Hi
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 10/06/14 22:30, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> > In message <201410061956.s96ju8s3089...@fire.js.berklix.net>, "Julian H.
> > Stacey
> > " writes:
> >
> >> For FreeBSD,
> >> I guess for serious security, every new device that is connected
> >> & reco
On 10/06/14 22:30, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <201410061956.s96ju8s3089...@fire.js.berklix.net>, "Julian H. Stacey
" writes:
For FreeBSD,
I guess for serious security, every new device that is connected
& recognised by /sbin/devd should in future be personaly authorised
In message <201410061956.s96ju8s3089...@fire.js.berklix.net>, "Julian H. Stacey
" writes:
>For FreeBSD,
> I guess for serious security, every new device that is connected
> & recognised by /sbin/devd should in future be personaly authorised
> by a human ! One can no longer trust what
fwd to HardenedBSD Developers
On 10/6/14, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi freebsd-...@freebsd.org, (I suggest replies to usb@)
> cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org FYI
>
> Ref. article on BadUSB pan OS (non FreeBSD specific) security loophole
> http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-2
20 matches
Mail list logo
