report.cgi?bug=837728
>
> The primary issue, so far as I can see, is that Heimdal and MIT were
> only compatible in the parts of the API that were formally
> standardized. For those of us who need MIT (to have a working kadmin,
> for example), that has pretty much always boiled down to
Le 14/09/2016 à 23:36, Dewayne Geraghty a écrit :
> Begs the question-what impact to FreeBSD distribution or use will US export
> control laws have, if FreeBSD migrated to MIT Kerberos?
I don't think it would have any impact, these days, the restrictions,
from what I understand, only apply to mili
e in the parts of the API that were formally
standardized. For those of us who need MIT (to have a working kadmin,
for example), that has pretty much always boiled down to completely
disabling Heimdal in base (and anything that depends on it, like
OpenSSH, pam_krb5, and GSSAPI-authenticated NFS
[...]
>
> Since 11.0 hasn't been released yet, is it within the realm of
> possibility to officially deprecate Heimdal-in-base before it ships?
> At this stage all that would involve is putting an announcement in the
> release notes.
If you're going to propose that,
Begs the question-what impact to FreeBSD distribution or use will US export
control laws have, if FreeBSD migrated to MIT Kerberos?
--
*Disclaimer:*
*As implied by email protocols, the information in this message is not
confidential. Any intermediary or recipient may inspect, modify (add),
cop
(was Re: OpenSSH HPN)
[See
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2015-November/008747.html
for the bits that Dag-Erling skipped]
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Benjamin Kaduk writes:
> > Things seem to have slowed down a lot since the lead Heimdal developer
> >
