On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 04:21:17PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Slawa Olhovchenkov writes:
> > OK, what about tcsh, zsh, fish and scp/sftp?
>
> I apologize for trying to help you out by suggesting a hack that works
> at least some of the time until I can get a permanent fix in. I should
Slawa Olhovchenkov writes:
> OK, what about tcsh, zsh, fish and scp/sftp?
I apologize for trying to help you out by suggesting a hack that works
at least some of the time until I can get a permanent fix in. I should
instead have hopped in my time machine, jumped back a few years, and
fixed the b
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 04:09:05PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Slawa Olhovchenkov writes:
> > Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > > In the meantime, you can try something like this in .bashrc or
> > > whatever:
> > Imposible. For accessing .bashrc on kerberoized NFS need correct
> > /tmp/krb
Slawa Olhovchenkov writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > In the meantime, you can try something like this in .bashrc or
> > whatever:
> Imposible. For accessing .bashrc on kerberoized NFS need correct
> /tmp/krb5cc_.
/etc/profile, then.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 03:50:45PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Slawa Olhovchenkov writes:
> > Can you do some small discurs about ssh+kerberos?
> > I am try to use FreeBSD with $HOME over kerberoized NFS.
> > For kerberoized NFS gssd need to find cache file "called
> > /tmp/krb5cc_, where
Slawa Olhovchenkov writes:
> Can you do some small discurs about ssh+kerberos?
> I am try to use FreeBSD with $HOME over kerberoized NFS.
> For kerberoized NFS gssd need to find cache file "called
> /tmp/krb5cc_, where is the effective uid for the RPC
> caller" (from `man gssd`).
>
> sshd contrar
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:31:22PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> The HPN and None cipher patches have been removed from FreeBSD-CURRENT.
> I intend to remove them from FreeBSD-STABLE this weekend.
Can you do some small discurs about ssh+kerberos?
I am try to use FreeBSD with $HOME over kerb
On 01/23/16 09:15, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Are you sure of this? I have not looked at the code, but my former
> colleagues at the high performance research network ESnet claim at
> http://fasterdata.es.net/data-transfer-tools/say-no-to-scp/ that the
> internal buffers and effective window size hav
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Julian Elischer writes:
> > what is the internal window size in the new ssh?
>
> 64 kB.
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
Are you sure of this? I have not looked at the code, but my former
colleagues at the high perfo
Kevin Oberman writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > Julian Elischer writes:
> > > what is the internal window size in the new ssh?
> > 64 kB.
> Are you sure of this?
Sorry, I was thinking of 6.6 (in stable/10). The buffer code in 7.1
supports dynamically-sized buffers with a hard limit of
Julian Elischer writes:
> what is the internal window size in the new ssh?
64 kB.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send a
On 22/01/2016 10:31 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
The HPN and None cipher patches have been removed from FreeBSD-CURRENT.
I intend to remove them from FreeBSD-STABLE this weekend.
The HPN patches were of limited usefulness and required a great deal of
effort to maintain in our tree. The None c
The HPN and None cipher patches have been removed from FreeBSD-CURRENT.
I intend to remove them from FreeBSD-STABLE this weekend.
The HPN patches were of limited usefulness and required a great deal of
effort to maintain in our tree. The None cipher patch was less onerous,
but it was a terrible i
13 matches
Mail list logo
