Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-21:08.vm missing in vuxml

2021-04-13 Thread Gian Piero Carrubba
* [Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 09:03:08PM -0700] Gordon Tetlow via freebsd-security: The current issues were committed to vuxml 6 days ago. Apparently, the backend that serves the vuxml for clients hasn’t been updated for the ports git transition. There is a pr for that already and hopefully it will

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-21:08.vm missing in vuxml

2021-04-13 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 13/04/2021 06:03, Gordon Tetlow wrote: On Apr 12, 2021, at 03:21, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: On 11/04/2021 21:49, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: * [Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 09:36:05PM +0200] Miroslav Lachman: On 11/04/2021 21:21, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: CCing ports-secteam@ a

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-21:08.vm missing in vuxml

2021-04-12 Thread Gordon Tetlow via freebsd-security
> On Apr 12, 2021, at 03:21, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > > On 11/04/2021 21:49, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: >> * [Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 09:36:05PM +0200] Miroslav Lachman: On 11/04/2021 21:21, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: > CCing ports-secteam@ as it seems a more appropriat

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-21:08.vm missing in vuxml

2021-04-12 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 11/04/2021 21:49, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: * [Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 09:36:05PM +0200] Miroslav Lachman: On 11/04/2021 21:21, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: CCing ports-secteam@ as it seems a more appropriate recipient. Vulnerabilities in base should be handled by core secteam, not ports sect

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-21:08.vm

2021-04-11 Thread Gian Piero Carrubba
* [Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 09:36:05PM +0200] Miroslav Lachman: On 11/04/2021 21:21, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: CCing ports-secteam@ as it seems a more appropriate recipient. Vulnerabilities in base should be handled by core secteam, not ports secteam. The maintainer address for vuxml is ports-

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-21:08.vm

2021-04-11 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 11/04/2021 21:21, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: CCing ports-secteam@ as it seems a more appropriate recipient. Vulnerabilities in base should be handled by core secteam, not ports secteam. Vuxml entries should be published together with Security Advisories. Miroslav Lachman * [Sun, Apr 1

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-21:08.vm

2021-04-11 Thread Gian Piero Carrubba
CCing ports-secteam@ as it seems a more appropriate recipient. * [Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 09:58:24AM +0200] Gian Piero Carrubba: * [Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:22:58PM +] FreeBSD Security Advisories: FreeBSD-SA-21:08.vm Security * [Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-21:08.vm

2021-04-11 Thread Gian Piero Carrubba
* [Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:22:58PM +] FreeBSD Security Advisories: FreeBSD-SA-21:08.vm Security * [Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:23:03PM +] FreeBSD Security Advisories: FreeBSD-SA-21:09.accept_filter Security * [Tue, Apr

FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-21:08.vm

2021-04-06 Thread FreeBSD Security Advisories
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 = FreeBSD-SA-21:08.vm Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: