Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> Please try these patches instead:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~des/SA-15:25/
New patches out with RAWDCF re-enabled.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.
Derek Schrock writes:
> 403 on all those files (patch/asc)
Damnit! The price of paranoia (umask 027 instead of the default 022).
Fixed, thanks.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freeb
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 07:12:58PM EDT, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > Please try these patches instead:
> >
> > https://people.freebsd.org/~des/SA-15:25/
>
> Some people have had issues with these patches due to mismatched
> $FreeBSD$ tags. I have uploaded a new
Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> Please try these patches instead:
>
> https://people.freebsd.org/~des/SA-15:25/
Some people have had issues with these patches due to mismatched
$FreeBSD$ tags. I have uploaded a new set which should work for
everyone. I have tested them on releng/* from right be
Please try these patches instead:
https://people.freebsd.org/~des/SA-15:25/
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any ma
"Herbert J. Skuhra" writes:
> So can anyone confirm that the ntp patches in the SA are correct and we
> are just too stupid to use patch?
I looked at the SA-15:25 patch, and it is incorrect. I will work with
the so@ to get correct patches released.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 01:29:03PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Herbert,
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:18:11AM +0100, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> H> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:24:03AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> H> > Guillaume Bibaut writes:
> H> > > Herbert J. Skuhra writes:
> H> > >
Herbert,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:18:11AM +0100, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
H> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:24:03AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
H> > Guillaume Bibaut writes:
H> > > Herbert J. Skuhra writes:
H> > > > OK, with 'patch -p0 < /path/to/ntp-102.patch' I get only [...]
H> > > As f
I had a similar issue with git-format-patch and git-am (on 10.1) where
the generated patch output was mangled or could not be imported correctly.
I ended up omitting the actual text patch extraction by going directly to
the git objects with git-cherry-pick.
No idea how to fix this though, sorry.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:24:03AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Guillaume Bibaut writes:
> > Herbert J. Skuhra writes:
> > > OK, with 'patch -p0 < /path/to/ntp-102.patch' I get only [...]
> > As far as I know, the SA does not mention 'patch -p0'. Shouldn’t this
> > be mentioned?
>
> BSD p
Guillaume Bibaut writes:
> Herbert J. Skuhra writes:
> > OK, with 'patch -p0 < /path/to/ntp-102.patch' I get only [...]
> As far as I know, the SA does not mention 'patch -p0'. Shouldn’t this
> be mentioned?
BSD patch(1) assumes -p0. GNU patch(1) does not. I assume Herbert is
used to GNU patch
Ok thank you for that.
As far as I know, the SA does not mention 'patch -p0'. Shouldn’t this be
mentioned?
Or does it mean every SA or EN have to be applied this way ?
I’m just wondering so that I can do it right next time.
--
Guillaume
> Le 27 oct. 2015 à 16:01, Herbert J. Skuhra a écrit :
>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:59:13PM +0100, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:35:56PM +0100, Guillaume Bibaut wrote:
> >
> > > Le 27 oct. 2015 à 12:46, Herbert J. Skuhra a écrit :
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:48:24AM +0100, Guillaume Bibaut wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:59:13PM +0100, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>
>> I guess that checking out releng/10.2 and compiling it would
>> succeed, because it’s a clean pull, but I’m not sure that releng/10.2
>> and applying patches to 10.2-RELEASE is the same
>
> Check https://www.freebsd.org/relen
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:35:56PM +0100, Guillaume Bibaut wrote:
>
> > Le 27 oct. 2015 à 12:46, Herbert J. Skuhra a écrit :
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:48:24AM +0100, Guillaume Bibaut wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I’ve been applying NTP patches successfully recently, but when I try
> >>
> Le 27 oct. 2015 à 12:46, Herbert J. Skuhra a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:48:24AM +0100, Guillaume Bibaut wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I’ve been applying NTP patches successfully recently, but when I try
>> to compile once patches applied, the make fails badly on ntp folders.
>> I’ve trie
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:48:24AM +0100, Guillaume Bibaut wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I’ve been applying NTP patches successfully recently, but when I try
> to compile once patches applied, the make fails badly on ntp folders.
> I’ve tried to download FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE sources, and to reapply
> patche
Hello,
I’ve been applying NTP patches successfully recently, but when I try to compile
once patches applied, the make fails badly on ntp folders.
I’ve tried to download FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE sources, and to reapply patches
since that release to be up to date, but the compilation fails in the same
18 matches
Mail list logo
