BNC, so I had VERY clear connection logs right in theire application
directory, which is SO stupid. I turned those logs to theire ISP and they
told me they would take care of the rest, don't bother for the rest, they
are probably kids, and if you think it
Quoting "Simon L. Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2005.11.06 21:48:52 +0100, Jimmy Scott wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:30:00PM +0100, Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerab
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:30:00PM +0100, Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4,
> ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's security
> run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the
>
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 12:42:16PM +, db wrote:
> On Saturday 29 October 2005 12:36, you wrote:
> > The issue is not one of want, but one of practicality. FreeBSD updates
> > to new versions of gcc relatively frequently, and having to update the
> > propolice patch with each update (or waiting
ome time to
find the bugs, report the bugs and get them fixed. And if you are
willing to use it in a production environment, you have to fully test
the software eacht time you are upgrading to be sure things will not
break. It's also not officially supported as far as I know.
Kind regards,
it you can disable it by default and
enable it explicit when you are willing to compile a binary with it.
Once applied and compiled the whole base with it enabled, you cannot just
turn back!
Kind regards,
Jimmy Scott
This message
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 05:04:45AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Jimmy Scott wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 10:15:23AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> > >
> > > +-le 16/10/2005 00:47 -0400, Kris Kennaway ?crivait :
>
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 10:15:23AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> +-le 16/10/2005 00:47 -0400, Kris Kennaway écrivait :
> | On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:39:27PM -0700, Stephen Major wrote:
> |> It has come to my attention that there are quite a few local exploits
> |> circling around in the privat
l >.
> >
> >
> > Is there any reason why one would need to compile the whole operating
> system?
> > I can understand that static linked apps need to be recompiled, but which
> > are there actually any at all (and linked against openssl)?
> >
> > Kin
mpiled, but which
are there actually any at all (and linked against openssl)?
Kind regards,
Jimmy Scott
This message has been sent through ihosting.be
To report spamming or other unaccepted behavior
by a iHosting customer, pleas
ition that is nosuid,
and starred out password for the user 'www'. The thing you describing happens
sometimes because users do not update there phpbb's either. I'm not affraid
since the kiddo would have the same access than a customer, which I cannot
trust either. If you don'
11 matches
Mail list logo
