still limited to be widely accepted in large production environments.
j.
Ivan Voras wrote:
Tobias Roth wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:09:53PM +0200, jere wrote:
And you cannot expect the port maintainers
to backport security fixes if the upstream provider chose to release the
fix only to
a clear chioce
to manage only ports security issues but I think it's primarily due to
lack of port maintainers.
Does anyone have other thoughts about this?
j.
Timothy Smith wrote:
jere wrote:
unfortunately, this is the dark side of FreeBSD security patch
management :) and I think also
unfortunately, this is the dark side of FreeBSD security patch
management :) and I think also the main reason FreeBSD isn't so widely
deployed into enterprise environments. It's ok for hacking or managing
few boxes but try to imagine how to manage security on hundreds of them
this way. :(
on
