On 11/18/12, Claude Buisson wrote:
> On 11/18/2012 21:28, b. f. wrote:
>
>
>
>> For the base system, and for projects, you should be able to use:
>>
>> https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/
>> https://svn0.us-east.FreeBSD.org/
>>
>> Unfortunately, AFA
On 11/18/12, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 05:07:16PM +0100, M. Schulte wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Can someone explain why the cvsup/csup infrastructure is considered
>> > insecure [...]
>>
>> Speaking of cvsup security -- correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I
>> know cvsup is general
On 7/27/11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message , Sean
> writes:
>
>>It's been part of the language standard for over 20 years now, [...]
>
> Much longer, it's specifically mentioned in the old testament.
>
You are referring to this, perhaps?:
Isaiah 26:14
They are dead, they shall not live; t
On 12/15/10, Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:36, Garrett Wollman
> wrote:
>> <> said:
>>
>>> If his allegations are correct, they should be easy to verify. He
>>> could post a copy of the NDA and a Freedom of Information Act request
>>> could be submitted to verify it. If, as clai
>I would love for it to go away entirely, and those base-system
>components that depend on it to learn how to use either Kerberos
>implementation from ports. (I'd also love for the ancient and broken
>base version of libcom_err to go away -- there's no knob to turn it
>off, and the shared library
Is anybody planning to update the base system heimdal, which has been
largely untouched since May 2008? In addition to the many other
bug-fixes and improvements in the current version 1.3.3 (see, for
example:
http://www.h5l.org/releases.html
), there are patches for heimdal vulnerabilities 2010-
