-10.patch.asc
[...]
Is the patch above is indeed FreeBSD_10.3_specific as it might be
considered according to the block name ("[FreeBSD 10.3]")?
Would it apply cleanly on 10.4?
--
George L. Yermulnik
[YZ-RIPE]
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org m
17:03/ntp-10.3.patch.xz.asc
> # gpg --verify ntp-10.3.patch.xz.asc
> b) Apply the patch. Execute the following commands as root:
> # cd /usr/src
> # patch < /path/to/patch
Looks like `unxz ...' command is missing here.
[...]
--
George L. Yermulnik
[YZ-RIPE]
_
Hello!
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 at 00:37:43 (+0300), George L. Yermulnik wrote:
> > https://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-16:31/libarchive-10.1.patch
> > https://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-16:31/libarchive-10.2.patch
> > https://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-16:31/lib
libarchive-10.3.patch
Thanx. I found that already, but Security Advisory is incorrect and that's the
point.
Anyway libarchive-10.3.patch generated on my 10.3 box a bunch of rejections,
so I had to checkout contrib/libarchive/libarchive/ and lib/li
ttps://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-16:31/libarchive.patch
fetch: https://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-16:31/libarchive.patch: Not Found
--
George L. Yermulnik
[YZ-RIPE]
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
://www.FreeBSD.org/handbook/makeworld.html>.
[...]
--
George L. Yermulnik
[YZ-RIPE]
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"