d to
reject incoming source routed packets?
On 5 October 2014 13:22, el kalin wrote:
> hmmm… could it be openvas?!
OpenVAS is a fork of Nessus from when it was open source.
HackerGuardian seems to use Nessus as the chief scanning engine.
Brandon Vincent
___
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 8:33 AM, el kalin wrote:
> should is submit this as a bug?
Can you first try adding "set block-policy return" to pf.conf? OpenVAS
might be assuming that a lack of response from your system to source
routed packets is an acknowledgement that it is accepting t
+ IBM AIX on occasion.
Brandon Vincent
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:10 AM, List Monkey wrote:
> Any other thoughts?
If you run ossec-rootcheck manually do you still get an alert?
Brandon Vincent
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
You should contact re@.
Brandon Vincent
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
n.
https://www.freebsd.org/releng/
https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.1R/schedule.html
Brandon Vincent
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
probably accidentally not published.
Brandon Vincent
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
It seems like this attitude will provide fuel to the argument that open-source
software is inherently less secure.
I'm surprised that SSH Communications Security hasn't used these posts yet as
an argument to why their product is more secure.
Brand
