Re: system identification in utx database?

2014-10-22 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
I asked in questions@ and got no reply, trying here. Thanks Anton >From mexas Mon Oct 20 10:37:52 2014 >To: freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org >Subject: system identification in utx database? >Reply-To: me...@bris.ac.uk > >Hello > >Is there any information in a utx(8) database (log) >that allows one

Re: Proposal

2014-04-09 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
>Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 23:28:29 +0100 >From: Joe Holden >To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Proposal > >The problem here is that a workaround wasn't communicated and I suspect >a very small number of religous users actually sub to security@ I do read it. > - also >bare in mmind th

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-14:06.openssl

2014-04-09 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
>From l...@lena.kiev.ua Wed Apr 9 10:43:40 2014 > >Port mail/sendmail-sasl (sendmail+tls+sasl2-8.14.8) depends on the >openssl port. You need to upgrade the security/openssl port to >openssl-1.0.1_10 and restart sendmail. I didn't know about this route of having authenticated sendmail. It's not m

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-14:06.openssl

2014-04-09 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
>From owner-freebsd-security-notificati...@freebsd.org Wed Apr 9 00:37:34 2014 > >IV. Workaround > >No workaround is available, but systems that do not use OpenSSL to implement >the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL v2/v3) and Transport Layer Security (TLS v1) >protocols implementation and do not use the