On 10/31/2017 08:23, Wall, Stephen wrote:
>> At least as about its first year and a half, LibreSSL had a markedly
>> better track record than OpenSSL (zero high-severity CVEs vs 5 from
>> OpenSSL, about half as many mid- and low-security CVEs).
>
> Are any of these relevant to the crypto module?
> At least as about its first year and a half, LibreSSL had a markedly
> better track record than OpenSSL (zero high-severity CVEs vs 5 from
> OpenSSL, about half as many mid- and low-security CVEs).
Are any of these relevant to the crypto module? Or are they all only
applicable to the SSL proto
On 31 October 2017 at 11:48, Eric McCorkle wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 04:05, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> On 29/10/17 8:36 am, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>>> On 10/28/2017 09:15, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <20171028123132.gf96...@kduck.kaduk.org>, Benjamin Kaduk
writes:
>>
On 10/30/2017 04:05, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 29/10/17 8:36 am, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>> On 10/28/2017 09:15, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>>
>>> In message <20171028123132.gf96...@kduck.kaduk.org>, Benjamin Kaduk
>>> writes:
>>>
I would say that the 1.1.x series is less bad, especiall
