-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
=
FreeBSD-SA-17:07.wpaSecurity Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 05:43:44PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> I fear I must wade into this thread, despite it being thick with FUD.
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 07:27:42PM +0200, WhiteWinterWolf (Simon) wrote:
> > Hi Ronald,
> >
> > Le 18/10/2017 ? 06:00, Ronald F. Guilmette a ?crit :
> > >
>
I fear I must wade into this thread, despite it being thick with FUD.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 07:27:42PM +0200, WhiteWinterWolf (Simon) wrote:
> Hi Ronald,
>
> Le 18/10/2017 à 06:00, Ronald F. Guilmette a écrit :
> >
> > In message <49252eda-3d48-f7bc-95e7-db716db4e...@whitewinterwolf.com>,
>
>
>
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 21:00:11 -0700
> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette"
> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: WPA2 bugz - One Man's Quick & Dirty Response
> Message-ID: <32999.1508299...@segfault.tristatelogic.com>
>
>
> In message <49252eda-3d48-f7bc-95e7-db716db4e...
Hi Ronald,
Le 18/10/2017 à 06:00, Ronald F. Guilmette a écrit :
>
> In message <49252eda-3d48-f7bc-95e7-db716db4e...@whitewinterwolf.com>,
> "WhiteWinterWolf (Simon)" wrote:
>
>> Ideally, you would use a specific protection for each of these layers,
>> so that an vulnerability affecting one laye