On 01/30/2017 09:36 PM, Heasley wrote:
whats wrong with providing a 7.4+v1 port for everyone to use?
What will happen when 7.4 gets a vulnerability, then? I don't think
you or I will be patching it (or anyone else) and therefore, the
port/pkg will be knowingly vulnerable.
Why do we want that?
Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 01:56:03PM -0800, jungle Boogie:
> On 30 January 2017 at 11:52, heasley wrote:
> > Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 01:57:32PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
> >> heasley writes:
> >> > So, what is the BCP to support a v1 client for outbound connections on
> >> > fbsd
> >> > 11? Hopefully
On 30 January 2017 at 14:24, heasley wrote:
> Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 01:56:03PM -0800, jungle Boogie:
>> On 30 January 2017 at 11:52, heasley wrote:
>> > Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 01:57:32PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
>> >> heasley writes:
>> >> > So, what is the BCP to support a v1 client for outboun
On 30 January 2017 at 11:52, heasley wrote:
> Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 01:57:32PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
>> heasley writes:
>> > So, what is the BCP to support a v1 client for outbound connections on fbsd
>> > 11? Hopefully one that I do not need to maintain by building a special ssh
>> > from
Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 01:57:32PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
> heasley writes:
> > So, what is the BCP to support a v1 client for outbound connections on fbsd
> > 11? Hopefully one that I do not need to maintain by building a special ssh
> > from ports. Is there a pkg that I'm missing?
>
> FreeB
heasley writes:
> So, what is the BCP to support a v1 client for outbound connections on fbsd
> 11? Hopefully one that I do not need to maintain by building a special ssh
> from ports. Is there a pkg that I'm missing?
FreeBSD 10 supports SSHv1 and will continue to do so. FreeBSD 11 and 12
do n
