On Thu, 5 May 2016, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
> > As a member of the security team for two projects (not FreeBSD's, though),
> > I can say that it is a lot of behind-the-scenes work to put out
> > advisories,
>
> Of course.
>
> > and batching them reduces the unit cost of a
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 09:38:26AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
M> The freebsd-update mirrors do not have the latest updates for amd64 on
M> any supported RELEASE. The i386 bits are there, but not amd64. I do not
M> know if generating them failed or if something else happened that
M> prevented their d
Totally the opposite, it means one rollout instead of X rollouts making it
simpler not harder.
I don't know, isn't that the logic behind Microsoft's failed
patch-Tuesdays?
It's important not to confound security with usability. Any delay to a
security advisory is an invitation to hackers. I d
Julian suggested that I share our private conversation:
Eric wrote:
> Regardless of my opinion on the topic, three of these are errata with no
> security implications, so the argument doesn't really apply in this context.
Julian wrote:
> Thanks Eric, fair point. So some of my argument doesnt a
On 05/05/2016 17:25, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
As a member of the security team for two projects (not FreeBSD's, though),
I can say that it is a lot of behind-the-scenes work to put out
advisories,
Of course.
and batching them reduces the unit cost of any given one.
If
Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> As a member of the security team for two projects (not FreeBSD's, though),
> I can say that it is a lot of behind-the-scenes work to put out
> advisories,
Of course.
> and batching them reduces the unit cost of any given one.
If so, their issue, not ours. Our concern is
On Thu, 5 May 2016, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Another bunch of Security alerts, degrades FreeBSD by being clumped together:
>
> I guess many recipients get tired of recent indigestable batches of
> multiple FreeBSD Errata & think approx:
I cannot recall whether you were participating in the discu
Another bunch of Security alerts, degrades FreeBSD by being clumped together:
Subject: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-16:17.openssl
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 22:55:46 + (UTC)
Subject: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-16:06.libc
Date: Wed, 4
On Wed, May 4, 2016, at 04:25, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 14:27:17 +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> > The best explanation of all this is John R. Vig's Quartz Tutorial
> > which is freely available on the web - highly recommended:
> >
> >http://www.am1.us/Local_
On Wed, May 4, 2016, at 21:32, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> On 5/4/2016 3:55 PM, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote:
> > FreeBSD-SA-16:17.opensslSecurity
> > Advisory
> > The FreeBSD
> > Project
>
> Something
> On 5 May 2016, at 12:56 PM, ga...@zahemszky.hu wrote:
>
> 2016-05-05 04:32 időpontban Mel Pilgrim ezt írta:
>> On 5/4/2016 3:55 PM, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote:
>>> FreeBSD-SA-16:17.opensslSecurity
>>> Advisory
>>>
On 05/05/16 05:56, ga...@zahemszky.hu wrote:
> 2016-05-05 04:32 időpontban Mel Pilgrim ezt írta:
>> On 5/4/2016 3:55 PM, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote:
>>> FreeBSD-SA-16:17.opensslSecurity
>>> Advisory
>>>
12 matches
Mail list logo
