Re: HPN and None options in OpenSSH

2016-01-23 Thread Michael Sinatra
On 01/23/16 09:15, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Are you sure of this? I have not looked at the code, but my former > colleagues at the high performance research network ESnet claim at > http://fasterdata.es.net/data-transfer-tools/say-no-to-scp/ that the > internal buffers and effective window size hav

Re: HPN and None options in OpenSSH

2016-01-23 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Julian Elischer writes: > > what is the internal window size in the new ssh? > > 64 kB. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no Are you sure of this? I have not looked at the code, but my former colleagues at the high perfo

Re: HPN and None options in OpenSSH

2016-01-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Kevin Oberman writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes: > > Julian Elischer writes: > > > what is the internal window size in the new ssh? > > 64 kB. > Are you sure of this? Sorry, I was thinking of 6.6 (in stable/10). The buffer code in 7.1 supports dynamically-sized buffers with a hard limit of

Re: HPN and None options in OpenSSH

2016-01-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Julian Elischer writes: > what is the internal window size in the new ssh? 64 kB. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no ___ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send a