Benjamin Kaduk writes:
> Things seem to have slowed down a lot since the lead Heimdal developer
> got hired for Apple. [...] MIT employs developers whose job
> descriptions include being the krb5 release manager [...] Heimdal has
> changed plans to a 1.7 release [...] and since the developers i
On 11/12/15 5:32 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 11/10/2015 1:42 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
I would also like to remove the NONE cipher
patch, which is also available in the port (off by default, just like in
base).
Fun fact, it's been broken in the port for several months with no
complaints.
On 11/12/15 3:28 AM, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:40:42PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 11/10/15 1:42 AM, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Some of you may have noticed that OpenSSH in base is lagging far behind
the upstream code.
The main reason for this is the burden of maintain
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Heimdal is (and has been for some time) undergoing constant development.
> For reasons unknown, they do not perform releases. I am aware of updates
> from heimdal that are being applied to the samba project (in fact some of
> the samba developers are
Slawa,
Heimdal is (and has been for some time) undergoing constant development.
For reasons unknown, they do not perform releases. I am aware of updates
from heimdal that are being applied to the samba project (in fact some of
the samba developers are also feeding into heimdal). The latest discus
Bryan Drewery writes:
> It's harder to maintain the port version due to how the patches are
> applied and generated.
I have the diametrically opposite experience. The workflow for ports is
significantly simpler than for base. Perhaps I should set up a paralell
workflow for OpenSSH and apply the
