On 2015/10/30 10:32, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Can those of you who are experiencing this bug on 10 please try to build
> and run a kernel from head@287591 or newer (with your 10 userland) and
> report back?
>
> # svnlite co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head@287591 /tmp/head
> # cd /tmp/head
> #
Please try these patches instead:
https://people.freebsd.org/~des/SA-15:25/
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any ma
"Herbert J. Skuhra" writes:
> So can anyone confirm that the ntp patches in the SA are correct and we
> are just too stupid to use patch?
I looked at the SA-15:25 patch, and it is incorrect. I will work with
the so@ to get correct patches released.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 01:29:03PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Herbert,
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:18:11AM +0100, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> H> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:24:03AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> H> > Guillaume Bibaut writes:
> H> > > Herbert J. Skuhra writes:
> H> > >
Can those of you who are experiencing this bug on 10 please try to build
and run a kernel from head@287591 or newer (with your 10 userland) and
report back?
# svnlite co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head@287591 /tmp/head
# cd /tmp/head
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC
# make installkernel KERNCON
Herbert,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:18:11AM +0100, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
H> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:24:03AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
H> > Guillaume Bibaut writes:
H> > > Herbert J. Skuhra writes:
H> > > > OK, with 'patch -p0 < /path/to/ntp-102.patch' I get only [...]
H> > > As f
I had a similar issue with git-format-patch and git-am (on 10.1) where
the generated patch output was mangled or could not be imported correctly.
I ended up omitting the actual text patch extraction by going directly to
the git objects with git-cherry-pick.
No idea how to fix this though, sorry.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:24:03AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Guillaume Bibaut writes:
> > Herbert J. Skuhra writes:
> > > OK, with 'patch -p0 < /path/to/ntp-102.patch' I get only [...]
> > As far as I know, the SA does not mention 'patch -p0'. Shouldn’t this
> > be mentioned?
>
> BSD p
Guillaume Bibaut writes:
> Herbert J. Skuhra writes:
> > OK, with 'patch -p0 < /path/to/ntp-102.patch' I get only [...]
> As far as I know, the SA does not mention 'patch -p0'. Shouldn’t this
> be mentioned?
BSD patch(1) assumes -p0. GNU patch(1) does not. I assume Herbert is
used to GNU patch
