On Thu, May 14, 2015, at 10:20, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
> On 14 mai 2015, at 16:13, jungle Boogie wrote:
>
> > On 14 May 2015 at 06:08, Mark Felder wrote:
> >>
> >> TLS 1.0 is dead and is even now banned in new installations according to
> >> the PCI DSS 3.1 standards. Nobody should expect T
On May 14, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Karl Denninger wrote:
> [ ... ]
> I'd love to lock out TLS 1.0 but if you do that anyone still running
> anything that uses XP cannot connect.
True for WinXP + IE6:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/viewClient.html?name=IE&version=6&platform=XP
However, large finan
On 5/14/2015 10:20, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
> On 14 mai 2015, at 16:13, jungle Boogie wrote:
>
>> On 14 May 2015 at 06:08, Mark Felder wrote:
>>> TLS 1.0 is dead and is even now banned in new installations according to
>>> the PCI DSS 3.1 standards. Nobody should expect TLS 1.0 to be supported
>
Hello
>> But I don't think disable TLS 1.0 is ok.
>>
>
> TLS 1.0 is dead and is even now banned in new installations according to
> the PCI DSS 3.1 standards. Nobody should expect TLS 1.0 to be supported
> by *any* HTTPS site now.
Maybe is dead but is used in many old browser / software still us
On 14 mai 2015, at 16:13, jungle Boogie wrote:
> On 14 May 2015 at 06:08, Mark Felder wrote:
>>
>> TLS 1.0 is dead and is even now banned in new installations according to
>> the PCI DSS 3.1 standards. Nobody should expect TLS 1.0 to be supported
>> by *any* HTTPS site now.
>
>
> Here, here! W
On 14 May 2015 at 06:08, Mark Felder wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015, at 05:19, Adam Major wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I checked now by sslLabs.com:
>> https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=forums.freebsd.org
>>
>> and score is A+
>>
>> But I don't think disable TLS 1.0 is ok.
>>
>
> TLS 1.0
On Thu, May 14, 2015, at 05:19, Adam Major wrote:
> Hello
>
> I checked now by sslLabs.com:
> https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=forums.freebsd.org
>
> and score is A+
>
> But I don't think disable TLS 1.0 is ok.
>
TLS 1.0 is dead and is even now banned in new installations accor
Patrick Proniewski wrote:
>> "Data Transfer Interrupted
>> The connection to forums.freebsd.org has terminated unexpectedly. Some
>> data may have been transferred."
>
> looks like your browser/OS does not support TLS 1.2.
I'm confused by FreeBSD policy, a lot.
Base OpenSSL in still supported r
On Thu, 14 May 2015 12:19:55 +0200, Adam Major wrote:
> Hello
>
> I checked now by sslLabs.com:
> https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=forums.freebsd.org
>
> and score is A+
Ah, so it is now .. it was still B only half an hour ago :)
> But I don't think disable TLS 1.0 is ok.
On 14 mai 2015, at 12:02, Ian Smith wrote:
> Well, I can't reach https://forums.freebsd.org/ at all at the moment, my
> (admittedly ancient, on 8.2) SeaMonkey now consistenly reports:
>
> "Data Transfer Interrupted
> The connection to forums.freebsd.org has terminated unexpectedly. Some
> data
Hello
I checked now by sslLabs.com:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=forums.freebsd.org
and score is A+
But I don't think disable TLS 1.0 is ok.
In test result paragraph: Handshake Simulation is informations that
page will not work on:
- Android 4.3 (and older)
- IE 6,7,8 on XP/Vi
On Thu, 14 May 2015 10:28:27 +0200, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
> On 13 mai 2015, at 23:18, Anders Gulden Olstad wrote:
>
> > Qualys report chain issues
>
> that's pretty odd, because I've checked too just after sending my
> reply to the list (message id
> a2d58ccb-8b0a-40ff-9ed1-89b698a83
On 13 mai 2015, at 23:18, Anders Gulden Olstad wrote:
> Qualys report chain issues
that's pretty odd, because I've checked too just after sending my reply to the
list (message id a2d58ccb-8b0a-40ff-9ed1-89b698a83...@patpro.net), and Qualys
reported no issues at all about the chain. That was abo
13 matches
Mail list logo
