On 1/28/2015 2:46 PM, Joe Holden wrote:
Really, how many SCTP users are there om the wild... maybe one?
It shouldn't be in GENERIC at the very least!
It's used for IP-based telecom backhaul with modern POTS networks and
cell networks. It's far better than TCP at handling the vagaries of
voi
Nonsense. Throw out a protocol that is more resistant to
Man-In-The-Middle and DDoS attacks due to an implementation bug? This
is a protocol that is built on lessons learned from TCP.
What should be done is more work improving the implementation and
widening the usage and uptake of SCTP.
On Thu,
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 01:20:56AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:01:50 -0800, jungle Boogie wrote:
> > Hi Nick,
> > On Jan 28, 2015 4:56 PM, "Nick Frampton" wrote:
> > >
> > > On 29/01/15 08:46, Joe Holden wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Really, how many SCTP users are there om the w
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:01:50 -0800, jungle Boogie wrote:
> Hi Nick,
> On Jan 28, 2015 4:56 PM, "Nick Frampton" wrote:
> >
> > On 29/01/15 08:46, Joe Holden wrote:
> >>
> >> Really, how many SCTP users are there om the wild... maybe one?
> >>
> >> It shouldn't be in GENERIC at the very leas
< said:
> I assume that you're using official packages and don't have a locally
> compiled Python interpreter or anything like that?
We build our own package repositories.
> Could you perhaps turn on auditing in order to find out what's touching
> these files?
Maybe. It will probably take a wh
