Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> If you give me a couple of days, I'll try to come up with a patch that
> collects and stores attach times during boot so we can gather and
> analyse real data.
Here's the patch, as a superset of Pawel's. The output looks like this:
des@crashbox ~% sysctl -b hw.atta
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:05:34 pm Mariusz Gromada wrote:
> Our task is to check if there are any autocorrelations in the X(w,t)
> process, which means checking if there are any dependencies between
> random variables X(w,t1) and X(w,t2) where t1 < t2.
Just to state an obvious fact (not s
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:40:20PM -0700, moused86799 wrote:
> one way of attacking the OS
> 1.search the lists
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-May/241042.html
> 2.)mouse intermittent works if problem with dbus-daemon
> 3.)analyze - dbus-daemon is a 'relatively unknown'
one way of attacking the OS
1.search the lists
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-May/241042.html
2.)mouse intermittent works if problem with dbus-daemon
3.)analyze - dbus-daemon is a 'relatively unknown' and extra DEPENDENCY
of moused
4.)set kern.securelevel=333
5.)interrupt
