Re: testing wireless security

2007-11-19 Thread Mark D. Foster
Josh Paetzel wrote: > When I looked in to this it seemed that the current state of affairs is that > WPA can only be broken by brute-forcing the key. I don't recall if that > could be done 'off-line' or not. My memory is that the needed info to > attempt bruteforcing could be done by simply re

Re: testing wireless security

2007-11-19 Thread Josh Paetzel
On Monday 19 November 2007 10:43:13 am Mike Tancsa wrote: > I have been playing around with 3 ath based FreeBSD boxes and seem to > have got everything going via WPA and a common PSK for 802.11x > auth. However, I want to have a bit more certainty about things > working properly. > > What tools do

testing wireless security

2007-11-19 Thread Mike Tancsa
I have been playing around with 3 ath based FreeBSD boxes and seem to have got everything going via WPA and a common PSK for 802.11x auth. However, I want to have a bit more certainty about things working properly. What tools do people recommend for sniffing and checking a wireless network ?

Re: IPSEC help

2007-11-19 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:06:32AM -0800, john decot wrote: > Hi , Hi. > As per suggestion, The following are the logs generated by racoon : > [] > 2007-11-17 13:46:22: INFO: received broken Microsoft ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY > 2007-11-17 13:46:22: INFO: received Vendor ID: FRAGMENTA