Re: Problem with IPSec tunnel, using IPv6 addresses, between Two FreeBSD systems...?

2005-06-29 Thread Tobias Roth
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 07:51:43AM +0100, mohan chandra wrote: > Hi All, > > I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two > FreeBSD systems using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is > host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) > systems with KAME IPSec implementation. [snip] Hi Please rese

Problem with IPSec tunnel, using IPv6 addresses, between Two FreeBSD systems...?

2005-06-29 Thread mohan chandra
Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. |->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram]

Re: Any status on timestamp vulnerability fix for 4.X?

2005-06-29 Thread Colin Percival
Uwe Doering wrote: > So 'tcp_seq.h' needs to be patched, too. [...] Or you could just follow the instructions in FreeBSD-SA-05:15.tcp. :-) Colin Percival ___ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-se

FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:15.tcp

2005-06-29 Thread FreeBSD Security Advisories
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 = FreeBSD-SA-05:15.tcpSecurity Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: T

FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:14.bzip2

2005-06-29 Thread FreeBSD Security Advisories
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 = FreeBSD-SA-05:14.bzip2 Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: b

FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:13.ipfw

2005-06-29 Thread FreeBSD Security Advisories
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 = FreeBSD-SA-05:13.ipfw Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: i

Re: Any status on timestamp vulnerability fix for 4.X?

2005-06-29 Thread Uwe Doering
Richard Coleman wrote: Uwe Doering wrote: Richard Coleman wrote: Any information on when (or if) the following timestamp vulnerability will be fixed for 4.X? Any information would be appreciated. http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/637934 FYI, the fix for RELENG_5 applies to RELENG_4 as is (a

Re: Perl master site changed to tobez.org?

2005-06-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 02:41:02PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > Michael Scheidell wrote: > > How safe is this your site? > > This doesn't matter (much), since the ports code checks MD5 hashes > before trusting a downloaded distfile. Well, after, but before using it :) Kris pgpj7Yn73QDxR.pgp

RE: Perl master site changed to tobez.org?

2005-06-29 Thread Michael Scheidell
Ok, yes, there is that... Thanks. > -Original Message- > From: Colin Percival [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 5:41 PM > To: Michael Scheidell > Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Perl master site changed to tobez.org? > > Michael Scheidell wrote

Re: Perl master site changed to tobez.org?

2005-06-29 Thread Colin Percival
Michael Scheidell wrote: > How safe is this your site? This doesn't matter (much), since the ports code checks MD5 hashes before trusting a downloaded distfile. Colin Percival ___ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma

Perl master site changed to tobez.org?

2005-06-29 Thread Michael Scheidell
Tobez: no disrespect intended, obviously you saw a problem with the master sites for perl 5.8.7 and did what you could to help, and with your position as a maintainer, I know that the trust we have in you and your patches is well earned, so don't take this question as anything but my well-earned pa

Re: Any status on timestamp vulnerability fix for 4.X?

2005-06-29 Thread Richard Coleman
Uwe Doering wrote: Richard Coleman wrote: Any information on when (or if) the following timestamp vulnerability will be fixed for 4.X? Any information would be appreciated. http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/637934 FYI, the fix for RELENG_5 applies to RELENG_4 as is (apart from the CVS versi