On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Jesper Wallin wrote:
Hi Mike,
First of all, thanks for your reply.. Nope, as far as I can see, I only
got 6 of those lines and nothing more.
I have a fxp0 in my other server, would you recommend me to switch the
NICs since the server using the xl0 got higher priority than the fx
>
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Jesper Wallin wrote:
>
>> Dear list,
>>
>> A few days ago one of my machines were attacked by a DDoS-attack using
>> UDP
>> on random ports.. When I later on analyzed the logs, I found this in my
>> dmesg:
>>
>> xl0: initialization of the rx ring failed (55)
>> xl0: initiali
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Jesper Wallin wrote:
Dear list,
A few days ago one of my machines were attacked by a DDoS-attack using UDP
on random ports.. When I later on analyzed the logs, I found this in my
dmesg:
xl0: initialization of the rx ring failed (55)
xl0: initialization of the rx ring failed (55)
Dear list,
A few days ago one of my machines were attacked by a DDoS-attack using UDP
on random ports.. When I later on analyzed the logs, I found this in my
dmesg:
xl0: initialization of the rx ring failed (55)
xl0: initialization of the rx ring failed (55)
xl0: initialization of the rx ring fai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
=
FreeBSD-SA-05:02.sendfile Security Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic: s
