ports with correct dependency specifications: Then portmaster would
> try to build run dependencies before their prerequisites are available).
>
> So, I'm sorry, but portmaster will not be able to upgrade the rubygem ports
> in the correct order, unless the port dependencies are fixed.
me time. Why not for Ruby?
>
> I'm just brainstorming Ruby FLAVORS. Both positive opinions and negative
> opinions are welcome.
Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7
and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby?
# Adam
--
Adam Weinberge
> On Sep 13, 2019, at 22:27, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>> Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7
>> and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby?
>
> I k
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) complexity
> > to python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people have ha
