Synopsis: Possible bug in Mk/bsd.ruby.mk
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ruby
Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Jul 21 08:10:20 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
bsd.ruby.mk is ruby territory (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/q
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer:
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build envir
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer:
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the
On Friday, July 20, 2012 23:35:10 Doug Barton wrote:
> Baptiste already volunteered to do an exp-run for this topic on Monday.
> If you don't have time to get your changes ready before then IMO we
> should go ahead with removing the line from bsd.gnome.mk. Making that
> correct fix now won't negati
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Jason E. Hale wrote:
> On Friday, July 20, 2012 23:35:10 Doug Barton wrote:
>> Baptiste already volunteered to do an exp-run for this topic on Monday.
>> If you don't have time to get your changes ready before then IMO we
>> should go ahead with removing the line f
On Saturday, July 21, 2012 11:38:39 Scot Hetzel wrote:
> > The problem with simply removing
> >
> > pkgconfig_RUN_DEPENDS= pkg-config:${PORTSDIR}/devel/pkg-config
> >
> > from bsd.gnome.mk is that there are ports that indirectly depend on
> > pkg-config for their build through other port
On 07/21/2012 13:48, Jason E. Hale wrote:
> IMO I don't really see what the hurry is. This has been the behavior for
> years.
Yes, and some of us have been annoyed by it for years as well. :)
The current behavior is wrong, and becomes increasingly painful in a
world where most FreeBSD users a
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/21/2012 13:48, Jason E. Hale wrote:
>
>> IMO I don't really see what the hurry is. This has been the behavior for
>> years.
>
> Yes, and some of us have been annoyed by it for years as well. :)
>
> The current behavior is wrong, and beco
KDE folks Jason's suggestion (by private e-mail for some reason)
was that we add pkgconfig to USE_GNOME= for every port that depends on
kdelibs that doesn't already have it; since almost, if not actually all
of them are currently relying on the run-dep side effect. I can't see
any reason NOT t
