Re: ruby 1.9 update patch

2011-06-12 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/12/11 18:05, Steve Wills wrote: > > Finally getting back to this. > > Here's an updated version of the patch: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~swills/ruby19_and_gems_changes3.diff.txt > > This, along with a patch to ruby-bdb: > > http://people

Re: ruby 1.9 update patch

2011-06-12 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/26/11 00:26, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Wed, 25 May 2011 07:54:21 -0400 > Steve Wills mentioned: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Thanks for the feedback! >> >> I was attempting to do some run time testing of this an

Re: ruby 1.9 update patch

2011-06-12 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/25/11 09:12, Eric wrote: >> From: Steve Wills >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Thanks for the feedback! >> >> I was attempting to do some run time testing of this and stumbled upon a >> strange issue. It seems that ev

Re: ruby 1.9 update patch

2011-05-25 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Wed, 25 May 2011 07:54:21 -0400 Steve Wills mentioned: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Thanks for the feedback! > > I was attempting to do some run time testing of this and stumbled upon a > strange issue. It seems that even without my patch (and with it too), if > you

Re: ruby 1.9 update patch

2011-05-25 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 5/25/2011 4:54 AM, Steve Wills wrote: > Thanks for the feedback! > > I was attempting to do some run time testing of this and stumbled upon a > strange issue. It seems that even without my patch (and with it too), if > you do this: > > cd /usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb > env RUBY_VER=1.9 make i

Re: ruby 1.9 update patch

2011-05-25 Thread Eric
> From: Steve Wills > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Thanks for the feedback! > > I was attempting to do some run time testing of this and stumbled upon a > strange issue. It seems that even without my patch (and with it too), if > you do this: > > cd /usr/ports/database

Re: ruby 1.9 update patch

2011-05-25 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for the feedback! I was attempting to do some run time testing of this and stumbled upon a strange issue. It seems that even without my patch (and with it too), if you do this: cd /usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb env RUBY_VER=1.9 make install on

Re: ruby 1.9 update patch

2011-05-19 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 05/19/11 02:02, Steve Wills wrote: The diff, and suggested progression seem rational and right to me. I've only read the diff though, not tried it. > gems and rake from ports for Ruby 1.9, just like we do for 1.8. This is > needed because some gems need the newer gems and rake. > > - From ther

ruby 1.9 update patch

2011-05-18 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, As part of the quest to get Ruby 1.9 as default, I'd like to consider this patch (attached and available here: http://people.freebsd.org/~swills/ruby19_and_gems_changes.diff ). This will bring Ruby 1.9 up to patch 180 and make it so that we use