On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 07:34:27AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/17/19 2:40 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> >
> > What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have
> > a big impact on build time and ressources required for building.
> >
> > If all you want is to have
Hi,
On 9/17/19 2:40 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have
a big impact on build time and ressources required for building.
If all you want is to have ruby flavors for the kicks of it, then I am
glad to tell you that no, it will not be
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:29:06PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Bottom line: flavors came into being to satisfy specific needs. Python 2
> underwent substantial changes during the upgrade to python 3, to the extent
> that many (most) python applications would cease to function. Similarly
> ph
Bottom line: flavors came into being to satisfy specific needs. Python 2
underwent substantial changes during the upgrade to python 3, to the extent
that many (most) python applications would cease to function. Similarly
php5 to php7. Without flavours the user-base would've been severly
impacted
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:16:50AM +0900, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 08:54:17AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > > The issue is that FLAVORS
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 08:54:17AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful)
> > > complexity to python ports a
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) complexity
> > to python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people have had to
> > be hyper-vi
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) complexity to
> python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people have had to be
> hyper-vigilant and watch commits closely to catch errors introduced when
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 08:39:12AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 6:27 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7
> > > and actual python. What is y
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:14:01AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
> We provide multiple versions of Ruby, it would make sense to provide gems
> for each version. In fact, I worked on this but never finished it:
>
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1
>
> Steve
That's nice. I will do anything that I ca
> On Sep 13, 2019, at 22:27, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>> Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7
>> and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby?
>
> I know the importance of Python 2.
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 6:27 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7
> > and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby?
>
> I know the importance of Python 2.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7
> and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby?
I know the importance of Python 2. Even if it is EoL-ed, it will be
required over the next a few
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:06 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:45 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports.
> > >
> > > AFAIK multiple version of R
Hi,
On 9/13/19 5:06 AM, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:45 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
Hi,
I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports.
AFAIK multiple version of Ruby ports (lang/ruby??) can be installed
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:45 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports.
> >
> > AFAIK multiple version of Ruby ports (lang/ruby??) can be installed at
> > the same time. One of
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:45 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports.
>
> AFAIK multiple version of Ruby ports (lang/ruby??) can be installed at
> the same time. One of these ruby ports will be *default* installed as
> PREFIX/bin/ruby. In contras
17 matches
Mail list logo
