On 7-6-2012 21:36, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:58:43 +0200
> Mel Flynn mentioned:
>
>>
>> Given issues described with swig 1.x earlier on this list, you may want
>> to investigate if swig 1.x should be removed/patched/whatever before
>> t
On 2-6-2012 3:32, Steve Wills wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I think we should try to make Ruby 1.9 the default Ruby again and would
> like to see it done before 9.1 is released. I've submitted a patch which
> does this and requested and exp-run from portmgr.
This may become obsolete soon, since graphics/g
