Re: Let me know switch default Ruby to 2.7

2020-03-13 Thread Koichiro Iwao
wrote: > Am 05.02.2020 um 01:50 schrieb Koichiro Iwao: > > please let me know before switching defautl Ruby to 2.7. > > I'm working on some issue on Ruby 2.7 with Yasuhiro KIMURA. After I > > finished it, default Ruby can be switched. > > let me know if 2.7 is stable,

Let me know switch default Ruby to 2.7

2020-02-04 Thread Koichiro Iwao
Hello Ruby folks, please let me know before switching defautl Ruby to 2.7. I'm working on some issue on Ruby 2.7 with Yasuhiro KIMURA. After I finished it, default Ruby can be switched. -- meta ___ freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.f

Ruby 2.7 will be able to build parallelly

2019-11-18 Thread Koichiro Iwao
Hi Ruby folks, I would like to let you know the issue Ruby cannot be built parallelly has been fixed in upstream [1][2]. When creating lang/ruby27 port in the future, MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes can be removed. Please keep in mind that. BTW, older versions of Ruby should be able to build parallelly if u

Re: FLAVORS for Ruby

2019-10-14 Thread Koichiro Iwao
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 07:34:27AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: > Hi, > > On 9/17/19 2:40 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > > What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have > > a big impact on build time and ressources required for building. > > > > If all you want is to have

Re: FLAVORS for Ruby

2019-09-16 Thread Koichiro Iwao
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 08:54:17AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) > >

Re: FLAVORS for Ruby

2019-09-16 Thread Koichiro Iwao
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) complexity to > python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people have had to be > hyper-vigilant and watch commits closely to catch errors introduced when

Re: FLAVORS for Ruby

2019-09-16 Thread Koichiro Iwao
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 08:39:12AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 6:27 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > > Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7 > > >

Re: FLAVORS for Ruby

2019-09-16 Thread Koichiro Iwao
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:14:01AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: > We provide multiple versions of Ruby, it would make sense to provide gems > for each version. In fact, I worked on this but never finished it: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1 > > Steve That's nice. I will do anything that I ca

Re: FLAVORS for Ruby

2019-09-13 Thread Koichiro Iwao
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7 > and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby? I know the importance of Python 2. Even if it is EoL-ed, it will be required over the next a few

Re: FLAVORS for Ruby

2019-09-13 Thread Koichiro Iwao
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:45 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports. > > > > AFAIK multiple version of Ruby ports (lang/ruby??) can be ins

FLAVORS for Ruby

2019-09-13 Thread Koichiro Iwao
Hi, I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports. AFAIK multiple version of Ruby ports (lang/ruby??) can be installed at the same time. One of these ruby ports will be *default* installed as PREFIX/bin/ruby. In contrast of Ruby lang, rubygem ports cannot be installed for multiple

call for help: ruby26 and requisites

2019-04-21 Thread Koichiro Iwao
Hi ruby people, I'm working on introduting Ruby 2.6 to ports tree based on Yasuhiro KIMURA's work. I'd appreciate if you test & review these: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230289 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234509 https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2 https:

bundler 2.0

2019-03-31 Thread Koichiro Iwao
Hi, I'd like to commit PR 235796. The change itself looks OK but it's a major update. It might affect some ruby ports. What should be tested? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235796 -- meta ___ freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list h

Re: please update textproc/rubygem-twitter-text

2017-01-24 Thread Koichiro IWAO
As described in comment, the issue is fixed >= 1.14.5. Hi, could anyone can update textproc/rubygem-twitter-text? I need a version that this issue is fixed. https://github.com/twitter/twitter-text/issues/162 -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta ___

please update textproc/rubygem-twitter-text

2017-01-24 Thread Koichiro IWAO
Hi, could anyone can update textproc/rubygem-twitter-text? I need a version that this issue is fixed. https://github.com/twitter/twitter-text/issues/162 -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta ___ freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd

Re: rubygems not working with ruby 2.2?

2015-03-05 Thread Koichiro IWAO
Reproduced in clean environment. I think devel/ruby-gems is too old and needs updating. ports version is 1.8.30 and the latest rubygems release is 2.4.6[1]. [1] https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/releases # confirm default ruby version is set to 2.2 grep DEFAULT_VERSIONS /etc/make.conf DEFAUL

Suggesting marking converter/ruby-iconv as IGNORE with ruby20

2013-07-26 Thread Koichiro IWAO
Iconv library was removed after Ruby 2.0. http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/50443 IMHO, converters/ruby-iconv should be marked as IGNORE or something suitable when RUBY_VER==2.0. It just fails "no such file or directory" at this moment. # cd /usr/ports/converters/ruby-ic