On 3/10/2014 16:22, clutton wrote:
> I really don't like that approach, because it's a documentation and
> since it's fetcheble no one will assume that it's the outdated version.
> It's better to remove that port at all.
>
> If you think that it should be done in that way, go ahead...
>
> I'm lit
On 3/9/2014 15:39, clutton wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 03:22 +, ed...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> Synopsis: lang/ruby-doc-stdlib: fails to fetch, checksum mismatch
>>
>> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ruby
>> Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
>> Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Mar 2 03
