Re: Ports of gem for Ruby 1.9 only

2012-12-07 Thread Stu
Ruby 2.0 will be released at the end of this month which will be backward compatible with 1.9.3. 1.8.* will be deprecated soon. ~ ___ freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby To unsubscribe, send any ma

Re: Ports of gem for Ruby 1.9 only

2012-12-07 Thread Patrick
I vote for a 1.9 default as well. This is now the default on our servers by way of /etc/make.conf, and we are using jails to support legacy 1.8.7 apps. On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Hiroyuki Iwatsuki wrote: > Thank you for your reply. > > > I think the best would be make 1.9 as default versi

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2012-12-07 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently scheduled for deletion

2012-12-07 Thread linimon
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the

FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken

2012-12-07 Thread linimon
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build envir