On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Steve Wills wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/11/11 21:37, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:32:30 -0500
>> Steve Wills mentioned:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 11/11/11 21:18, S
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> I believe it might do. I'm not sure though you can run depend on something
> that build depends on you, so it needs testing.
Even if it "works" I'd like to see if we could find an alternate
solution. These sort of changes seem like they a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/11/11 21:37, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:32:30 -0500
> Steve Wills mentioned:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/11/11 21:18, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>>> Yes, we can actually do that. We're dis
Synopsis: lang/ruby19 fails to handle a signal (TERM, HUP, etc)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ruby
Responsible-Changed-By: eadler
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Nov 12 02:39:53 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
over to ruby
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161551
Synopsis: [PATCH] lang/ruby18: Add option to build with Profile-Guided
Optimization
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ruby
Responsible-Changed-By: eadler
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Nov 12 02:38:03 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
over to ruby
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:32:30 -0500
Steve Wills mentioned:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/11/11 21:18, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> > Yes, we can actually do that. We're discussing the possibility of making
> > lang/ruby19 to depend on ruby-gems and rake, thus having rub
Synopsis: [PATCH] lang/ruby19: Add option to build with Profile-Guided
Optimization
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ruby
Responsible-Changed-By: eadler
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Nov 12 02:37:30 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
over to maintainer
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/11/11 21:18, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> Yes, we can actually do that. We're discussing the possibility of making
> lang/ruby19 to depend on ruby-gems and rake, thus having ruby19 installation
> automatically install rake and gem as well. But nobo
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:52:07 -0700
"Aaron D. Gifford" mentioned:
> I'm not familiar with the inner workings of FreeBSD's port system, but
> is it possible that issues like 'gem' and 'rake' suddenly no longer
> being part of the lang/ruby19 port (due to the aforementioned outdated
> versions) coul
I'm not familiar with the inner workings of FreeBSD's port system, but
is it possible that issues like 'gem' and 'rake' suddenly no longer
being part of the lang/ruby19 port (due to the aforementioned outdated
versions) could be dealt with during some sort of post-install hook
while installing the
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The gem version distributed in ruby 1.9 is too old for some ports,
> so FreeBSD uses the rubygem from ports instead. To get the gem
> command back just install the ruby-gems port.
>
> --
> Stanislav Sedov
> ST4096-RIPE
>
> () asci
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:55:06 -0700
"Aaron D. Gifford" mentioned:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using RUBY_DEFAULT_VER=1.9 in my /etc/make.conf for months
> now successfully to ensure that gem, ri, irb, ruby, etc. were
> correctly symlinked in /usr/local/bin/ to the *19 commands. However
> today upon buil
Hi,
I've been using RUBY_DEFAULT_VER=1.9 in my /etc/make.conf for months
now successfully to ensure that gem, ri, irb, ruby, etc. were
correctly symlinked in /usr/local/bin/ to the *19 commands. However
today upon building the /usr/ports/lang/ruby19 port and installing it
afresh, I discovered tha
13 matches
Mail list logo
