Re: eaccelerator hit: log msgs

On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:30:30 +0200 Daniel Gerzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > put this into php.ini: > eaccelerator.debug = 0 > next time please read eaccelerator's documentation :-) I did. I also read the eaccelerator.ini.example file but did not know (or guess) that these options could go into php

/tmp permissions

Today I read that /tmp always is "noexec". That should probably be on linux, because on my fbsd-6.1 box it's "rw" and that's it. Question: should I change /tmp to "rw,noexec" to be safer? -- dick -- http://nagual.nl/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 +++ The Power to Serve __

ext usb2 drive and fbsd6

Maybe I should not ask this here but I take my chances. I love fbsd but it /is/ pickier on some hardware than windows and I don't want to use that software, so.. I'm planning an external hardrive. NAS (network attached storage) drive are very expensive. So I will buy an usb2 drive, I think. As al

Re: vmware library problem

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:59:53 + Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I fixed this by adding LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/X11R6/lib to the > environment, but since I actually have a choice of > > /usr/compat/linux/usr/X11R6/lib > /usr/X11R6/lib > > which should I actually use? For some reason ev

Re: ext usb2 drive and fbsd6

On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:20:08 -0700 Micah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > dick hoogendijk wrote: > > Maybe I should not ask this here but I take my chances. I love fbsd > > but it /is/ pickier on some hardware than windows and I don't want > > to use that softwar

Re: quick way fall back to the original kernel

On 13 Aug Atom Powers wrote: > And, although I've never tried it, you sholud be able to `cp > /boot/kernel.old /boot/kernel` to restore the previous kernel.> I did. A few times. I just renamed the directories to "kernel" and "whatevername" ;-) Works like a charm.. -- dick -- http://nagual.nl/ --

cdrecord

Installed cdrecord from ports. This version does not include DVD-R/DVD-RW support code. Cdrecord-porDVD is needed. I want to burn DVD-R's. Can this be done with FreeBSD? Do I need cdrecord-devel for this? -- dick -- http://nagual.nl/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 ++ The Power

/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcvsservice.so.0" not found, required by "quanta"

/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcvsservice.so.0" not found, required by "quanta" This file is missing and I would like to know from which package this file comes. I'm sure there is some kind of command prompt which I regrettely don't know ;-( Anyone? -- dick -- http://nagual.nl/ -- PGP/

pear does not compile

Does anyboy also has issues with the latest PEAR-1.4.11 ? [errors]= ===> Installing for pear-1.4.11 ===> pear-1.4.11 depends on file: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - found ===> pear-1.4.11 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20020429/pcre.so - found ===> pear-1.4.11 depends on

Fw: lothlorien.nagual.nl security run output

I'm a little worried after reading the security output this morning. It seems some files [ping, ping6, shutdown, at, atq and atrm] have setuid diffs. I really don't know why this could have happened. I updated some ports yesterday, but I don't think any port writes in /sbin (?) Could someboddy advi

strange files

Recently I see a lot of these file in thje root directory. Probably by a newer version of FAM Is there an option to get tem be put elsewhere. fam.conf and man fam learn me nothing ;-) the listing === drwxr-xr-x 22 root wheel -1024 Aug 28 10:23 ./ drwxr-xr-x 22 root wheel -

Re: Fw: lothlorien.nagual.nl security run output

On 28 Aug David Robillard wrote: > Did you reinstall the entire OS _before_ you installed Osiris? Did you > find out why your SUID files had changed in the first place? No. I did a "diff" with the same files on other freebsd-6.1 machines which I'm absolutely certain are not compromised. The file

Re: Fw: lothlorien.nagual.nl security run output

On 30 Aug nicky wrote: > In your message you state, "Begin forwarded message [some Xorg update > warnings deleted]:" > > Isn't it so that in your message, lines 3 to 12 are just port related > binaries? (i assume xorg related). Meaning that ping/ping6, etc aren't > updated at all. At least i don

zfs question

Years back I ran FreeBSD, so I have some experience. The last couple of years I ran Solaris, followed by Opensolaris. I am very satisfied. However, considering the troubles after Oracle took over I have rebuild my server system under FreeBSD-8.1 (now running as a virtual machine under VirtualB

Re: zfs question

On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote: Yes. It works very well. On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to speak) which will work fine for most purposes. Of course, if your system has particularly demanding IO patterns, then you may have to tweak some loader.conf or s

Re: zfs question

On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote: Yes. It works very well. On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to speak) which will work fine for most purposes. One other thing comes to mind. I want a very robus, fast rockl solid *server* It will be a file- email and webser

amd64

I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I fetch are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself? Are those amd64 too? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-quest

gmirror of zfs mirror

I'm convinced that ZFS mirroring is far better than gmirroring, but the latter uses much less memory (I think). My server has 3Gb and is solely used as server (web, files/nfs/samba, dns, mail). The data is serves does not change much, so I would think the data integrity checks of ZFS although u

AHCI driver

I'm told it would be better to enable the AHCI driver form my SATA2 drives. It would make ZFS perform better on them. From the release notes I get: FreeBSD cam(3) SCSI framework has been improved and a new k

Re: zfs question

On 10-8-2010 16:00, David Rawling wrote: On 9/08/2010 2:52 AM, krad wrote: So I ask you to ponder - at four o'clock in the morning, with mail down, web servers down and all the disks holding your files failing to mount - which file system or disk structure would you prefer to try to troubles

GEOM GPT table is corrupt. Recover?

I wanted to install ZFS on two 1Tb harddisks. I did a fdisk -I /dev/ad12 to begin with, but: GEOM: ad12: the primary GPT table is corrupt or invalid GEOM: ad12: using the secondary instead -- recovery strongly advised. OK, I want to follow up on this advice, but HOW? The "corruption" probably

Re: GEOM GPT table is corrupt. Recover?

On 10-8-2010 16:59, Tim Baird wrote: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad1 bs=64k count=1 Then repartition with either fdisk of gpartdepending on disk size They are 1Tb sata2 disks and I want them fully used for ZFS. Do I need partions then? The EFI label in OpenSolaris just made the disks avai

ZFS woes

FreeBSD-8.1/amd64 -> I spend all evening trying to create a ZFS mirror on my two 1Tb sata2 drives formerly used under opensolaris (zfs22) I wiped out the firt mb; i used sysinstall to create a fbsd slice; wiped it out again; booted knoppix to create an EFI / GPT; booted into opensolaris and cr

ZFS woes 2

In addition to my former message, would a total cleaning of both harddrives be usefull? I.e. by running "|dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad12" or "||dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/ad12" | ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/m

gmirror gm0

How can I totally remove a created gmirror (gm0) I know of the option gmirror forget gm0 but does that make the mirror disappear? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe

Re: ZFS woes

On 11-8-2010 0:52, Dale Scott wrote: wiped out the firt mb; i used sysinstall to create a fbsd slice; wiped it out again; booted knoppix to create an EFI / GPT; booted into opensolaris and created a zpool (v14), but nothing, nothing did the trick. I was doing a vanilla fbsd install recently us

Re: ZFS woes

On 11-8-2010 7:05, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: On 11-8-2010 0:52, Dale Scott wrote: [cut the former message..] I just found out that the process to repair offending disks with GEOM errors, bad labels etc.. can be repaired a lot quicker. # gmirror label -vb round-robin gm0 /dev/ad12 ## -- disk

zfs data on disk

Where does ZFS keeps its data *on disk* for created/exported/imported vdevs? Is /etc/zfs the only place or are there other places? Thanks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To uns

ZFS data from snv_b134 to fbsd

I want to transfer a lot of ZFS data from an old OpenSolaris ZFS mirror (v22) to a new FreeBSD-8.1 ZFs mirror (v14). If I boot off the OpenSolaris boot CD and import both mirrors will the copying from v22 ZFS to v14 ZFS be harmless? I'm not sure if this is teh right mailinglist for this question

Re: ZFS data from snv_b134 to fbsd

On 12-8-2010 20:04, David Brodbeck wrote: On Aug 12, 2010, at 6:10 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I want to transfer a lot of ZFS data from an old OpenSolaris ZFS mirror (v22) to a new FreeBSD-8.1 ZFs mirror (v14). I'm NOT a ZFS expert, but I think it should be OK as long as you don'

releases, branches,..

My years of OpenSolaris made me forget the use of releases and branches. I'm not into too much compiling anymore. I want a stable, but also safe server. I'm running 8.1-RELEASE now, but what about security issues found? What do I need to run if I want the lates and needed security patches? I do

Re: releases, branches,..

On 12-8-2010 22:53, Polytropon wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:46:18 +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I'm running 8.1-RELEASE now, but what about security issues found? Which brach do I follow? In this case, use "freebsd-update" to track -RELEASE; you will get the security pa

ZFS not usable on FreeBSD-8.1

I run FreeBSD-8.1/amd64. I have used ZFS for four years on (Open)Solaris, so I have some experience with it. It always served me very very well. However, I cannot get it to work on my SATA2 drives. At first I thought they'de suffer from something from there OpenSolaris ZFS mirroring. So, I wip

STAT RL+ process

I have a process on v1 which shows STAT RL+ Do I understand it correctly that this process is waiting for a lock? And if it does this for quite some time it is probably not getting it and I can wait forever for this process to complete? ___ freebsd-

Re: ZFS not usable on FreeBSD-8.1

On 14-8-2010 21:24, George Hartzell wrote: You haven't provided enough information for me to make a concrete suggestion, but this kind of thing often seems to boil down to something getting confused over slices and partitions when they both have the same extent (start->end) on disk. This used t

cg0: bad magic number

My 1Tb sata2 drives work very well with FreeBSD. They can be sliced, partitioned and newfs can be run. However, no matter what I try (sysinstall, gpart) when I slice my 500Gb drive and create a partition in it (1 block smaller than the slice) I can not newfs the /dev/ad8s1a It always end up wi

Re: ZFS not usable on FreeBSD-8.1

On 15-8-2010 3:10, George Hartzell wrote: Dick Hoogendijk writes: > And how do I make the partition precisely one block smaller than the > slic it lives in? > How do I know what the "blocksize" is? > > > Are you using explicit device names to add

Re: ZFS not usable on FreeBSD-8.1

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 04:49 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > > My 500Gb drives won't however. they keep on giving cg); bad magic number. > > Sysinstall won't newfs the drives. newfs -U /dev/gm1a (created with the &g

Re: ZFS not usable on FreeBSD-8.1

On 16-8-2010 20:14, Roland Smith wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:35:58AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 04:49 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: My 500Gb drives won't however. they keep on giving cg); bad magic n

Re: ZFS not usable on FreeBSD-8.1

On 16-8-2010 23:13, Graeme Dargie wrote: Bit of a long shot, but have you tried enabling AHCI mode for the sata drives in the bios and setting ahci_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf assuming your the board supports it. I will certainly check this one out. Wouldn't know if my MB supports it. Hope

Re: ZFS not usable on FreeBSD-8.1

On 16-8-2010 20:14, Roland Smith wrote: It could be that newfs is overwriting the partition table. Can you post the output of 'gpart show' and 'bsdlabels1'? westmark# gpart show ad8 => 63 976773105 ad8 MBR (466G) 63 9767731051 freebsd [active] (466G) westmark# bsdlab

boot0cfg

I dumped/restored the system to ad8 yesterday and booted from it. The system *did* boot but (alas) the /dev/ads1a(f) slices were mounted. So, the system loaded the *old* root partitions (from the first drive). After googling and reading I think I need *boot0cfg* but I'm a bit scary to ruin my

Re: ZFS not usable on FreeBSD-8.1

Dear Sir/Madam, Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to. For more information on our business please click on the following link: [1]Click here for our website We look forward to your continued business in the future. Regards, Webmaste

printcap

Can somebody point me to some information about what to write into /etc/printcap on a FreeBSD machine for a Laserjet that is connected though CUPS on an OpenSolaris server? Linux/Windows computers automatically "see" this printer because it is "broadcasted", but my FreeBSD computers do not an

Re: migrate system disk

On 22-9-2010 17:06, Dánielisz László wrote: I have an old HDD which should be replaced soon, actually that HDD stands as my system disk, what is your suggesion, how should I migrate the FreeBSD 8.1 from the old disk to the new one? Attach the new disk to your system and do a dump / restore act

Re: The nightmarish problem of installing a printer

On 22-9-2010 20:40, David Brodbeck wrote: OI may be the only person here who actually likes CUPS. Yes, it's complicated from a software standpoint, but configuring it is much less opaque. You're certainly not the only one liking CUPS. I long hesitated to use it, but once I'd decided to do so

Re: The nightmarish problem of installing a printer

On 22-9-2010 21:35, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 22/09/2010 20:04:25, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: You're certainly not the only one liking CUPS. I long hesitated to use it, but once I'd decided to do so, I wouldn't go back to lpr. No way. It's very easy to set up and does a great

port upgrading

I'm in doubt. I wanted to bring my ports collection uptodate, so I ran "csup -L 2 /root/ports-supfile" and that updated my ports collection. At least, I hope so. Then I started googling and found that cvsup is not recommended. Better tot use portsnap (???) And also portupgrade was a no go. I

Re: port upgrading

On 26-9-2010 19:13, Matthew Seaman wrote: Really either of those two will serve you well, as will various others I like portupgrade. One question about dependencies: if I want to update *one* port I have to run "portupgrade -R portname", right. But *when* do I run portupgrade -R ,name> c.q.

Re: Prevent symbolic links in pure-ftp!

On 27-9-2010 21:07, Joshua Isom wrote: On 9/27/2010 12:00 PM, Phan Quoc Hien wrote: hi! How to prevent symbolic links in pure-ftp for security issuse? User can access outsite chroot by create symlink: ln -s / abc => and user can change dir to / Anyone can solve this problem? Have you re

<    2   3   4   5   6   7