Re: JDK14 fails to install

2004-12-11 Thread Zlatozar Zhelyazkov
See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/2004-July/002568.html On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:57:04 -0700, Tom Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello List, > I'm trying to do a fresh install of the jdk14 port and I get the > following error: > > o linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.05 > > > > .java

Re: Firefox and Macromedia Flash Plugin...

2005-03-01 Thread Zlatozar Zhelyazkov
Try this: cd /usr/ports/net/firefox/ make install clean cd /usr/ports/www/flashplugin-firefox/ make install clean cd /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/ make clean all install cd /usr/ports/devel/linuxthreads make install clean cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper make install clean cd /usr/ports/prin

JDK1.4 build dies...unexpected

2005-01-24 Thread Zlatozar Zhelyazkov
Hi all, Here is my output when I try to install jdk14 on my computer. == ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Extracting for linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.06_1 => Checksum OK for j2sdk-1_4_2_06-linux-i586.bin. ===>

Re: keeping freebsd uptodate - doubt

2005-02-02 Thread Zlatozar Zhelyazkov
Here are some useful links. Read carefully!! http://www.taosecurity.com/keeping_freebsd_applications_up-to-date.html http://www.taosecurity.com/keeping_freebsd_up-to-date.html On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 06:49:06 -0800 (PST), saravanan ganapathy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Karol Kwiatkowski <[EMA

STABLE kernel update

2005-02-03 Thread Zlatozar Zhelyazkov
Hi all, I updated my FreeBSD up-to STABLE and build kernel, but "uname -a" shows FreeBSD-STABLE #0 It was suspicious that there is no kernel patch releases so I checked. Really there were! My question is - should I apply this patches or there are included in my last update (and applied with kernel

Re: Configure X Server

2005-02-16 Thread Zlatozar Zhelyazkov
I will suggest different way just type: xorgcfg -textmode In this way you will avoid editors ;) Best, Zlatozar On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:49:07 -0600, W. D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 12:23 2/15/2005, Peterhin wrote: > > >>OK thats great, now that I am there, my problem is with say 'ee' > >h