Greetings all:
I have a ADSL connection where the upstream pipe is smaller than
the downstream with it at 1.5Mbps/384kbps now and will be upgrading to
6Mbps/608kbps soon. The issue I'm having is that whenever I upload, it
fills the upstream to full capacity and the downstream would lag as
On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
> Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Greetings all:
> >
> > I have a ADSL connection where the upstream pipe is smaller than
> > the downstream with it at 1.5Mbps/384kbps now and will be upgrading to
> > 6M
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Vincent Poy wrote:
> On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
>
> > Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Greetings all:
> > >
> > > I have a ADSL connection where the upstream pipe is smaller than
> > > the dow
On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
> Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
> >
> > > Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Greetings all:
> > > >
> > > >
On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
> Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > After reading ipfw(8), I hope I have it correct that it's
> > like this:
> >
> > ipfw add queue 1 ip from any to any out xmit xl0
>
> Shouldn't "
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
> Vincent Poy writes:
> >
> >That's the part where it becomes difficult since even though I
> > have 8 IP's, it's still on a /24 mask so only the 8 IP's in that /24 are
> > actually local.
>
> Use
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Friday, 5 September 2003 at 17:55:14 +0200, Hans Vledder wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I am considering building a 802.11g FreeBSD access point. I've read
> > that I will need a network adapter that supports hostap (access
> > point mode). Does anyone known a
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Lalani, Qureish wrote:
> Pondering the idea of installing free bsd on my box. My only concern is
> whether or not there is a driver for the Linksys PCI 802.11g wireless
> adapter. Any guidance is appreciated.
Until there is a Broadcom driver which is what LinkSys uses
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, C. Ulrich wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 23:37, Travis Troyer wrote:
> > I have a US Robotics V.Everything external modem connected to
> > my system running FreeBSD 5.1 stable. I got my ppp.conf and
> > ppp.linkup files setup properly, and was able to dial-up to
> > my provid
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Kirk R. Wythers wrote:
> I just ran into a problem trying to install the 5.0 world. I thought I
> checked and had 30M free on / before I started this. However, after
> building, the world, building the kernel, installing the kernel, running
> mergemaster -p, I went to install
Greetings everyone:
I have a question on the Intel Gigabit NIC's. Other than price,
is there any difference in performance (full wire speed) between the
Pro/1000T and the Pro/1000MT. Thanks.
Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Vice President __
Unix Networ
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:20:19 -0400
> Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is PPP setup required? AFAIK, Verizon doesn't require an
> > authname/authkey challenge, since it logs the Mac Address of the NIC,
> > as well as the modem itself.
t; one up.
>
>
> Thanks for the info guys.
>
> Lou
>
> On 09/26/02 09:52 PM, Vincent Poy sat at the `puter and typed:
> > On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:20:19 -0400
> > > Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTE
I thought there were some GTE territories on the east coast as
well. Not all Verizon West territories have the ATM yet since the FR
networks can be at a minimum of T1 speed but the ATM requires atleast a
DS3. In Hawaii, 90% of the DSLAM's are still FR.
Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings everyone:
Does anyone know what needs to be done to the tcpd - tcp wrappers
to get banners to work? Thanks.
Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Vice President __
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ]
WurldLink
by banners? and in what environment? (You talking about
> ad banners on web pages? or something else)
>
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Vincent Poy wrote:
>
> > Greetings everyone:
> >
> > Does anyone know what needs to be done to the tcpd - tcp wrappers
> > to get b
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Jun wrote:
> Hello there.
>
> Greetings!!!
>
> I would like to ask if how can I fix the error I always receive from my box FreeBSD
> 5.0-p7 when i run any executable program such as gmake, httpd, etc.:
>
> gowee# gmake release
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:34:50AM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Jun wrote:
> >
> > > Hello there.
> > >
> > > Greetings!!!
> > >
> > > I would like to ask if how can I fix
On 9 Jul 2003, Marvin J. Kosmal wrote:
>
>
> .forward file
>
> So I want to forward my mail from
>
> a box with the email as
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> to
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> So if I understand this the syntax would be ( in .forward)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ???
>
> Yes/N
I have a question regarding this as well. Let's say that my
FreeBSD is running on a Dell Inspiron 8200 notebook with a Fujitsu 2.5"
4200rpm 60GB HD which has 116280 cylinders/16 heads/63 sectors per track/
512 bytes per sector. I just recently bought a Hitachi TravelStar 7K60
7200rpm 60GB
ike Tancsa wrote:
>
> use g4u to make a copy of your HD to a local ftp server off your original
> drive. You can then restore it that way too. i.e you dont need both drives
> in at the same time.
>
> ---Mike
>
> At 10:56 AM 30/08/2003 -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
> &
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Mark wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Vincent Poy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mike Tancsa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Gho
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:12:25PM + or thereabouts, Mark wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Vincent Poy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Mike Tancsa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Mark wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joshua Oreman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Ghost for FreeBSD
>
>
> > > > cd /mnt/root
> > > > /sbin/dump -L -f- /|
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:27:03PM + or thereabouts, Mark wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Joshua Oreman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:08
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:58:35AM -0700, Joshua Oreman typed:
>
>
>
> > > Ok; what you have done is made a dump on the root mirror device; great! But
> > > how do I now tell FreeBSD to use that "restored" partition as /? Edit
> > > /etc/fstab to effect
Is there a tutorial somewhere on how to do RAID1 in FreeBSD with 2
drives with the 2nd drive either same capacity or larger. I know the 2nd
drive will only have the same capacity as the first but assuming you were
using the FreeBSD Standard Boot Manager and then have /, /var, /usr - is
the
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Mark wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Vincent Poy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Ruben de Groot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Joshua Oreman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: We
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Mark wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Vincent Poy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Ruben de Groot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Joshua
> Oreman&qu
Greetings all:
I'm planning to upgrade my old apache with a newer version and add
SSL but I noticed the ports has both apache + modssl as well as apache +
OpenSSL, are there any differences between the two of them and is one of
them better than the other? Thanks.
Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL P
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:07:03PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
>
> > I'm planning to upgrade my old apache with a newer version and add
> > SSL but I noticed the ports has both apache + modssl as well as apache +
> > OpenS
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, bryan m wrote:
> I've got an empty directory named ".snap" in my root directory, can anyone
> tell me what this is for?
See dump(8) manpage on the -L option.
Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Vice President __
Unix Networking Operations -
Hi everyone:
On one of my disks that has no files in it mounted as /mnt/usr,
fsck is creating the lost+found directory and underneath each one are
directories named starting with # that is empty, is there anyway to remove
these? Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [10:26am][/mnt/usr/lost+found] >>
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 08:27:11AM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
> > Hi everyone:
> >
> > On one of my disks that has no files in it mounted as /mnt/usr,
> > fsck is creating the lost+found directory and underneath each on
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:00:12PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
>
> > > They're just directories, remove them in the usual way.
> >
> > Tried that, didn't work...
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [4:00pm][/mn
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 03:53:13PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:00:12PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
> > >
> > > > > They&#
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 04:03:35PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
>
> > > > > > > They're just directories, remove them in the usual way.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tried that, didn'
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Vincent Poy wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 04:03:35PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > They're just directories, remove them in the usual way.
> &
On this subject, I have one of my own... I have a
6.016Mbps/608kbps ADSL connection with 8 static IP's from my ISP. I'm
using the FreeBSD box to basically limit my upstream bandwidth to 480kbps
so that the downloads would work while uploading. In my kernel, I do have
the following option
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> cannot comment on the reason for the huge delay (but one
> way to check what is going on is to change the pipe's bandwidth
> and see if anything changes), but i see a big
> misunderstanding on weights vs. priorities in your
> configuration:
The de
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:56:08PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:
> ...
> > > the above configuration means that if queue 1 is getting a bandwidth
> > > X, then queue 2 will get 0.99X, queue 3 will get 0.98X, queue
> > > 4 wi
41 matches
Mail list logo
