We have a box doing routing and NAT using IPNAT that freezes up after a couple
days. We have swapped out the Box with a different model and continue to
see the same problem. Symptoms are that the machine no longer passes
traffic and the console is unresponsive to any keyboard input (not even
; kernel with 8G of ram + could point me in the right direction.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Michael
> > ___
> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
d it under 5.4 (non PAE kernel), same behavior. This is
definitely a problem that appears to be in 5.4 and 6.0.
Any Ideas?
--
| Ted WisniewskiE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| Manager, Systems GroupWEB:http://oz.plymouth.edu/~ted/ |
| Information Technolog
Here is a description of the problem...
In 5.2-RC and 5.2-RELEASE there appears to be some issue with
filesystem or I/O subsystem under 5.2-X. Now, You can install and do the normal
kind of things, however, when you create a lot of I/O on the disk there
seems to be a problem actually rea
chine will run for days with this happening, however,
I have another system that is actually doing a lot of I/O eventually
it crashes (well locks up completely)... If there is any particular info you
might need, I am willing to do what I can.
Ted
(* In the last episode (Jan 10), Ted Wisni
(* In the last episode (Jan 11), Ted Wisniewski said:
(* > Thanks for your response... As you can see in this output from the
(* > ps command you suggested, the processes are dfinitely waiting on the
(* > disk. BTW.. The syste in question was a fresh install from yesterday
(* > w
(well at least
I have not been able to yet). If someone has things to try, I will give it a
whirl.
Ted
(* (* In the last episode (Jan 11), Ted Wisniewski said:
(* (* > Thanks for your response... As you can see in this output from the
(* (* > ps command you suggested, the process
t.
I am pretty sure this can be done, but what is the easiest/best way do
implement? How would this be done for a bridging firewall?
Any advice is appreciated.
Thankd,
Ted
--
| Ted WisniewskiE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| Manager, Systems Group
: xl0:lower lower many0
#
ngctl connect sk1: xl0:lower lower many1
ngctl msg sk0: setpromisc 1
ngctl msg sk1: setpromisc 1
ngctl msg xl0:lower setconfig "{ xmitAlg=1 failAlg=1 enabledLinks=[ 1 1 ] }"
--
| Ted WisniewskiE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| Mana
if_bgereg.h) has been modified in the following way:
#define ETHER_ALIGN 0
I saw this change in the mailing list as a solution to get the card working.
(Otherwise it did not want to pass traffic for more than a few moments).
So, what might cause "bge_watchdog(ifp)" to be
about
this limit for the future. If someone knows and can get back to me
it would be a big help.
Thanks,
Ted
--
| Ted Wisniewski E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| Manager, Systems Group WEB: http://oz.plymouth.edu/~ted/ |
| Information Technolog
ot; that I have to put in pam.conf?
Any help / advice would be greatly appreciated.
Ted
--
| Ted Wisniewski INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| Information Technology Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Plymouth Sta
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a Multi-head video card (the more heads the better,
I am thinking 4 heads if possible) that will work with XF86 and FreeBSD 4.8
or 5.1. The sooner the better. I may be able to get some Free FreeBSD
press out of the results..
Thanks,
Ted
--
| Ted
13 matches
Mail list logo