In a message dated 11/1/04 4:37:09 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> "Don't use 5.x because its slow" IS technical help. You guys just dont
> want anyone to say it.
>"You guys?" I wasn't aware that I was representing anyone but myself.
>
>It seems all you want to do is contrad
> yeah, I also didn't notice his return
> address at first. That already explains much :).
>
> I think I actually sorta, kinda got it working.
> I'll do some tests and update if my observations
> are valid.
>
>
>
> Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> > On 10/28/2004 9:30 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
>
In a message dated 11/3/04 12:42:27 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>1) Wasted my time and everyone elses who read this crap.
>2) Tried to give certain freebsd developers a bad name.>
>3) Discredited several others on the list.
>4) Contributed NO facts or hard evidence to back
In a message dated 11/4/04 10:18:41 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Good point. Looking at /usr/src/usr.sbin/ppp/vjcomp.c it does appear
>> to only affect the headers.
>
>My point is not so much that only headers compression is affected, but that
>only TCP headers are aff
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > A member of the Gustapo said:
>
> This is offensive.
get over it already. Nobody really cares anyway.
>
> > Its easy to dismiss people who ask hard questions as "trolls". Its
> > a lot more difficult to answer the questions credibly.
>
> I don't think we sho
In a message dated 11/6/04 4:59:05 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello guys,
>I've set out to spoof my gateway's mac address so that I can get a
>new ip address from my cable ISP without having to unplug my modem for
>24 hours as they suggested (and is understandable, thats
In a message dated 11/8/04 5:46:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Releases are fixed points in time. They are marked on their respective
branch
>of development and that's it. A x.y-RELEASE version is effectively a
symbolic
>name for a specific moment in time.
Wow, thats w
In a message dated 11/8/04 2:22:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Lets do the math...
>> you'll note that http://torrents.freebsd.org:8080/ at this moment
>> says there's been 1978 completed downloads.
>> Lets pick an arbitrary average size for each file downloaded: 388MB
In a message dated 11/8/04 10:12:47 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> In a message dated 11/8/04 5:46:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >Releases are fixed points in time. They are marked on their respective
> branch
> >of development and that's i
Its become widely used for "sharing" in the same way as Kazaa and
other "point to point" as they're called protocols. Many ISPs block it,
or at least substantially slow it down.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
In a message dated 11/8/04 10:49:14 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> How discouraging for you not to understand that.
>
> Its "discouraging", because a "Release" should be " a completed set of
> features that have been tested and thought to be bug-free"
>You know that this i
In a message dated 11/8/04 11:54:37 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> on the "release", which should be a known, completed code base.
>
> All part of the experience I suppose.
>The whole world is in beta. Get over it.
Only the open-source world.
I notice the same 3 loser
In a message dated 11/8/04 11:33:41 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Its become widely used for "sharing" in the same way as Kazaa and
> other "point to point" as they're called protocols. Many ISPs block it,
> or at least substantially slow it down.
>Well. Of course it can
In a message dated 11/8/04 2:41:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>As far as open-open source being the only one in beta, I work in
>development where our code is closed-source. Even we have to admit that
>our releases fit better into the category of BETA than RELEASE.
Which i
In a message dated 11/8/04 1:49:35 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> the Gigabytes K8NSNXP-939 motherboard have the Marvell 8001 Gigabit
Ethernet
>> controller and the ICS 1883 LAN PHY chip integrated. Are they supported?
>>
>>
http://www.giga-byte.com/Motherboard/Product
In a message dated 11/8/04 1:23:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Its not a legal/illegal issue. Its a "using more bandwidth than you are
> paying for" issue. Im sure if you were running bittorrent all day long
> your ISP would be very glad to see you go.
>I'm paying for a
In a message dated 11/8/04 5:31:33 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>So when will you switch to decaf? Seriously though, in case you didn't
>notice this IS an open source discussion list, FreeBSD 5 is not just
>another snapshot it has undergone qualification and is in my experi
In a message dated 11/8/04 4:59:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This is a technical forum? Yikes!
>Is it, Mr./Ms. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"?
Well then why don't you fill Mr. "I pay my ISP so I should be able to use all
the bandwidth I want" how things really work, because I don
In a message dated 11/8/04 4:46:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>So we went from three losers to four bozos
Well I had to add you now, didn't I, Mrs. Butterworth? Now this is something
we can discuss. What is more insulting, being called a Loser or a Bozo?
_
In a message dated 11/9/04 1:10:57 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
>don't believe in democracy but in this case it could come handy.
>Somebody could propose like: "let's get this fuck off the list" and we'd
>say ... well ... I say YES!
wow, i think both name-calling and usin
In a message dated 11/8/04 4:46:24 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>By the way, Iâve tested our competitions printers. HPâs printers are far
better >designed than anything else Iâve worked with. The point is
programming
and >computer technologies are very young fields. Youâr
In a message dated 11/9/04 9:58:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"I have a FreeBSD 5.x box with two NICs that I'd like
to set up on the same subnet. The purpose is to run
separate services on each NIC. I have the box set up
with my rc.conf containing the following lines:
d
In a message dated 11/9/04 5:24:53 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm not saying that's how it works, but when this thread started, that's how
> it was depicted.
>It most certainly wasn't. SInce it was me who said that releases are 'points
>in time', which is what you have
As promised, I've tested the basic network stack for 5.3 -RELEASE
The results follow:
Hardware:
Celeron 1.7Ghz processor
Dual onboard Intel NICs, fxp driver
Intel 845G chipset
256MB Ram, 120MB allocated to the kernel.
Setup:
Traffic Generator -> FreeBSD System -> Server
The FreeBSD system is s
In a message dated 11/12/04 9:38:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm trying to investigate some potential solutions to escape from
> different microsoft specific malware (like gator's software).
> The two mentioned in subject were found after some Google search.
> Wonder w
In a message dated 11/11/04 5:38:34 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Given these results, I would conclude that the raw routing stack in 5.3
> is 35-40% slower than its 4.x counterpart.
>
> The tests are easy enough to duplicate,
In a message dated 11/12/04 1:22:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The issue with proxies is that they are a drag on your network; using
> squid as a firewall only isnt very smart. If you are already using it
> fine. But on a large network you are better off using a firewall
In a message dated 11/11/04 1:36:28 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>FreeBSD 4.10: 42% interrupt usage
>FreeBSD 5.3: 58% interrupt usage
>Thanks for your test results. Was DEVICE_POLLING enables in the kernel and
>the sysctl?
No, it wasnt
___
28 matches
Mail list logo
