Still looks like dns attempts anyway - what is in /etc/resolv.conf on
iP_addr_2?
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, [ISO-8859-2] Gannater János wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've posted this question to the freebsd-newbies list, but there nobody
> could answer it.
> Please help me with this qestion...
>
> I have a b
Its created by UW's imap/pop stuff - if you actually SEE it then you must
be also using something else from time to time to access your mail folder.
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, David Banning wrote:
> I get the following message in my mailbox from time to time. Is it really
> necessary to keep it there
The full answer is way easier - business with it and NO BEEPER BEEPIN at
2AM! (and on less powerful hardware even! )
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> >
> > Hi All!!!
> >
> > I think that WinXP more popular and more easy than FreeBSD. People
> > all over the world know what i
You show 167 as a broadcast on the first IP line then try to use it also
as an available ip
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Rus Foster wrote:
> Hi All,
> I've just tried to bring up a new IP alias and am having trouble using it
>
> Currently
>
> ls512# ifconfig -a
> vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> in
I used to go with adeptecs, but now use tekrams - they seem faster.
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Darryl Hoar wrote:
> Greetings,
> I am building a department level server and
> am going to be running Freebsd & Samba on
> it instead of the windows headache. The
> machine is going to have a 12/24GB Dat
how bout systat - that might flush up which is goin nuts
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Varshavchick Alexander wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Daniela wrote:
>
> > Watch your top (or ps -ax) output. Anything odd there?
> >
>
> Nothing odd - many mysqld processes as usual...
>
>
> Alexander Varshavc
Ive still got my traffic blocked for that reason - the second I drop the
filter the pipes plug up..
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Derek Zeanah wrote:
>
> >I was chatting with our internet provider who gets their feed from ATT,
> >he notified me that they are blocking all ICMP protocols.
> >By gosh by g
Unfortunately, dynamic usually means not a business - which often means
spam - and we are all losing hair over the war on spam.
I now block ip's with no reverse dns
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Doug Poland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This isn't so much a FreeBSD topic but a comment and a request for resources
It all depends on the provider - the tech they use - for instance, we use
MVL for sdsl, whereas verizon uses something else for adsl.
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, David Banning wrote:
> I am looking at buying a dsl modem used but I am not aware of
> the differences from one to the next. I am using a G-n
> We started blocking on no rDNS several months ago, and it's been extremely
> effective with low false positive problems. I heard that AOL started
> refusing connections with no rDNS about a month ago which makes it easier
> to justify our policies to the clueless.
Yah - I waited for a month or
anyone know how to block email if they dont have reverse dns on pre-exim
4?
I see call back stuff, and make em match stuff - but I want just, if it
has NONE
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
I do
cat /dev/null > mainlog
etc
On 6 Aug 2003, Kirk R. Wythers wrote:
> /var is full, and I see that /var/log/exim files are huge
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:230 pwd
> /var/log/exim
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:231 ls -lh
> total 172088
> -rw-r- 1 mailnull mail 102M Aug 6 10:32 mainlog
> -rw-
same here - all from rr.com and all .pif files
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Matt Heath wrote:
> Charles Howse wrote:
>
> >Has anyone besides me been receiving a flood of infected emails?
> >
> >All the emails have the same subject lines:
> >
> >Thank you!
> >RE: That movie
> >RE: RE: My Details
> >RE:
I need the cf lines (not mc stuff) to scan for and reject any email with
"--0700" in the date line - its what that new sobig has stuck on every
single copy to enter my system. Anyone know how to do this?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists
Nobody answered - sendmail seems open to a colon hack - and I cannot find
a solution for love or money (the newest sendmail's cf still has this)
The header from ordb that manages a relay is
To: @buffnet.net:"@buffnet.net:marvin"@marvin.ordb.org
Any ideas short of gettin a new mta?
__
More looking on my earlier relay issue, its exploting route-addr - yet I
still cant find a way to plug it up..
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTE
16 matches
Mail list logo