Re: Unknown Program

2005-11-15 Thread Russell Meek
Gerard Seibert wrote: I am running FreeBSD 5.4 presently. In my /usr/local/etc/rc.d directory, I have come across this file: '001slpd.sh'. I cannot seem to find out what it does or how it got there. It does not appear to be running; however, employing the 'status' switch produces nothing. I

Re: Should I have 2 copies of OpenSSL?

2005-11-20 Thread Russell Meek
Justin Meyer wrote: Hi Russell! On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Russell E. Meek wrote: Justin Meyer wrote: What gives? Is the way things should be? Or did I foul something up somewhere along the way through my upgrades? If I did mess something up, what should I do to fix it? Just

Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance

2005-11-22 Thread Russell Meek
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:32:12PM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: Hello, Maybe it's my own opinion but I've discovered that 6.0 kernel is much slower than 5.4, I mean GENERIC in both cases. It's only your own opinion until you share with us the measurements that

Re: Can't compile kernel

2005-11-23 Thread Russell Meek
Lowell Gilbert wrote: Don't top-post, please. Jose Borquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Jose Borquez wrote: I made a standard install of FreeBSD 5.4 with Kern-Developer Full binaries and doc, kernel source only. I attempted to compile a cus

Re: args to `make` within the ports tree

2005-11-23 Thread Russell Meek
Roland Smith wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 10:50:19AM -0500, Mike Hernandez wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:35:13PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: There appears to be so many arguments to `make` when compiling applications fro the ports tree. What beats me is where they are docu

Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance

2005-11-23 Thread Russell Meek
Dmytro Surovtsev wrote: Kris, thanks for reply. I did not provide any special tests for performance, I catch it just working on my workstation - P-4, 3 GHz, 512 MB. Long time ago (several monthes) I've used Gentoo Linux, but siwtched to FreeBSD because of better performance especially when I

SCHED_ULE Scheduler FreeBSD 6 - Release

2005-11-23 Thread Russell Meek
Is anyone here currently using the *SCHED_ULE* scheduler in a server enviroment, production or non? Pros? Cons? Thanks, Russell ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe

Re: /tmp permissions

2006-08-07 Thread Russell Meek
Quoting dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Today I read that /tmp always is "noexec". That should probably be on linux, because on my fbsd-6.1 box it's "rw" and that's it. Question: should I change /tmp to "rw,noexec" to be safer? -- dick -- http://nagual.nl/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Ru