First off stats
FreeBSD 4.10 Release
Now to buissness, Im trying to install POE and so I go installing
perl -MCPAN -eshell
cpan> install POE
now it does the fun scrolling then after a little bit dies on this
64 tests and 2 subtests skipped.
Failed 45/125 test scripts, 64.00% okay. 454/2693 subtests
Hi dear sirs!
Correct please if me wrong, but as i know the source tree of FreeBSD already
split into two parts - Servers-oriented (FreeBSD) and PC-BSD (Desktop oriented)
? Or team from PC-BSD is not FreeBSD peoples? WBR
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > Having to pay Verisign instead of Microsoft makes no difference: the
> > point is why should I have to pay anything to a third party in order to
> > run whatever OS I want on a piece of hardware I own?
It's time to
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> anyway NOBODY are forced to buy micro-soft software.
That's almost correct but not quite. In 99% of the cases any Intel commodity
mafiaware comes with a preinstalled Winblows. You're paying for it whether
you want it or not. You can get a refund in many cases but it's mo
Mark Felder wrote:
> Yes, let's all run ALPHA and MIPS hardware. I'll just jam my Nvidia card
> into one of the available slots and everything should work OK, right?
Dear Numbskull,
It's co-dependent hostages like you who enable Intel Mafiaware. According to
your logic we should all be using
> If you read Fedora's page they were planning to tighten their boot
> sequence to then only boot their approved binary kernels.
Save your old copies of lilo and grub. You're gonna need them if you want to
stay on Intel Mafioso hardware.
> Risk of key revocation later
> If hardware manufac
> My assessment is still being built so thanks for sharing your thoughts on
> this, Jerry
Not that I paid attention to the proposal, because I decided a few decades
ago governments were the root of all evil and nothing they do is for
anybody's good. There isn't enough time in the universe to read
