Re: ! why?

2004-03-25 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Outlook user subscribed to the list to make things like this happen, you know. HTH, HAND. - P -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard,

Re: My FreeBSD 3.2

2004-03-30 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
.2.1 is likely to take a long time, and as far as I know should not be done in one step. Seriously, you'll save yourself a lot of trouble by just installing the newer release clean and restoring whatever it is you need (such as home directories) from a reliable backup. - P -- Peter N. M.

Re: Building a FreeBSD based mail server

2008-07-31 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
the opportunity to do greytrapping for added bonus) - P -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.2

Re: pf to block against DDoS?

2008-09-04 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
/pf/>, with the direct link to the part about state tracking and bruteforcers at <http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/bruteforce.html>. (and of course there's the book, nudge, nudge) - P -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.co

Re: pf firewall for a server

2006-07-26 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
lishment on this (untested, may contain nuts) is possible, and you could probably do worse than spend a few moments browsing the PF docs or for that matter my rather basic PF tutorial at http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/ to familiarize yourself with the system. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, membe

<    1   2